from Musical U
http://www.facebook.com/pages/p/412254762289166
Creating, Listening, Understanding (with Tony Parlapiano of popMATICS)
One of our favourite things to see at Musical U is a member exclaiming “Why did nobody ever tell me this?!” Because we’re all about simplifying the complex, and filling in the pieces that can otherwise be totally missing from music learning.
Today I want to introduce you to someone else who thrives on simplifying powerful musical ideas, to deliver those kinds of “aha” moments for passionate music-learners: Tony Parlapiano of popMATICS.
Watch the episode:
Subscribe For Future Episodes!
Enjoying the show? Please consider rating and reviewing it!
Links and Resources
Enjoying Musicality Now? Please support the show by rating and reviewing it!
Creating, Listening, Understanding (with Tony Parlapiano of popMATICS)
Transcript
Christopher: One of our favorite things to see at Musical U is a comment along the lines of âwhy did nobody ever tell me this?!â
Because filling in those missing pieces is really what we exist to do here at Musical U. And today, I want to introduce you to someone else who thrives on simplifying powerful musical ideas to deliver those kinds of âaha!â moments for all kinds of passionate music learners: Tony Parlapiano of popMATICS.
We are always on the lookout here at Musical U for passionate music educators who share the same kind of vision we do, of empowering the average music learner to achieve phenomenal things through unlocking greater musicality. And over the past year or so, we’ve been hearing more and more about popMATICS.
You can go to popmatics.com now to check it out, but it’s a new site started by Tony, and it has a really interesting approach and a way of helping students that’s all very much aligned with what we do at Musical U.
And so we kept hearing from our members, some of our keenest members were also tuned into what Tony was doing, and they were raving about it.
So we were super excited to have the chance to bring Tony in as a Guest Expert a little while back. Today, I want to share his mini-interview that we did before his Musical U masterclass, where we talk about his views on musicality, where popMATICS came from, and how they approach teaching the way they do.
It is a piano/keyboard-focused approach, but as you’ll discover, it really unlocks deeper musical understanding that I think is relevant for any instrument.
And you’ll also be hearing briefly from Angela on the popMATICS team, too.
So I’ll be back tomorrow with a clip from the masterclass you’ll hear him talk about in just a moment. But for now, please enjoy this mini-interview with Tony Parlapiano of popMATICS!
âââ
Christopher: Today, I’m joined by Tony Parlapiano of popMATICS, where they help music lovers develop their keyboard and piano skills and really have a kindred philosophy to our own at Musical U, helping enable that musician or music learner to tap into their true potential and gain more freedom.
So I’m super excited to have Tony with us. He’s here as our Guest Expert at Musical U this month, so he’ll be in coaching our Next Level members, as well as presenting our masterclass for all of our members this afternoon.
Tony, welcome to the show!
Tony: Yeah, thanks for having me. Glad to be here.
Christopher: So, I always like to begin with my favorite question to ask musicians and music educators, which is: what does musicality mean to you?
Tony: I think musicality, to me, I would think about it like, my connection to music, how close I feel to music.
And I know that I can connect to music through listening. I can connect to music through creating. I can connect to music through understanding.
And the more that I practice those three areas of my music learning, the closer I feel to music, the more I feel I understand music. And not only does it give me the ability to express myself through music, but it also heightens my ability to understand what others are trying to communicate as well.
So that’s how I would define it, is your connection with music and the desire to continue to get closer to it.
Christopher: I love that. That’s a wonderful definition. And we are more and more talking about that connection piece here at Musical U, because it’s one of those things where, once you think about it, it’s bizarre that we don’t teach that in a very active way in music education as a whole.
You know, I went through probably 20 years of instrument lessons without anyone talking about connection, anyone helping me connect more with the music or with my instrument or with my instinct for music. It just wasn’t covered.
Tell me a little bit about what you do at popMATICS, and how that connection piece fits in.
Tony: Well, at popMATICS, to me the seed always comes from creating. And I believe that students should be in an environment where there’s not such a strong emphasis on what notes you’re playing or playing things correctly.
That students should have, I like to say, like, at least five minutes. If someone were to tell me I have, like, an hour to practice each day, I would tell them the first five minutes I would devote to just creating.
And you can use some type of constraint for your creativity. You can say, I’m going to work within a particular key, or I’m going to try to use a particular chord progression. But the idea is that you’re not trying to recreate something that somebody else made. It’s a generative force.
And I always believe that that is the connection to everything, because many people who want to learn to play by ear or learn through listening, just be able to play what they hear. A lot of that can come through the creative process.
And especially we at popMATICS, part of what we try to encourage students to do is not only create every day, but actually record yourself every day. And we give them a locker where they can submit those recordings. And we take them through a sequenced approach so that they can continue to build on these, on their improvisation and their creativity.
But the idea is that you go back, you listen to these recordings. If you can recognise the sounds, what you were working with in your own recordings, you’re so much more likely to recognise it when you hear it from others.
And so those three areas of learning for us, which is creating, listening, and understanding, I find that whenever somebody is neglecting one of those areas, they won’t reach their full potential unless they’re doing all three.
So I see a lot of people who, they love to analyze music. They’ve got a lot of head knowledge, but they don’t really make a lot of music.
Or maybe they make a lot of music, but they don’t try to learn anything from someone else.
And I find that these three areas really complement each other and continue to help develop students musical freedom so that they can just have the confidence to⊠I will find the sounds that I’m looking for. I will find the sounds that I hear and imagine.
Christopher: Yeah. And, you know, popMATICS came on our radar just because we were hearing so many of our own members raving about it.
They were really getting involved in your stuff and loving it. And then I know you met with our Head Educator, Andrew, who came away being like âthere is so much in common here!â And a lot of what you just talked about is really near and dear to our hearts, in terms of enabling that creativity and helping fill in the missing pieces or rebalance things.
So I’d love to hear a little bit more about how your approach works in terms of the methodology, or the format, or how do you help musicians with this stuff?
Tony: Well, I think the foundation comes from, I’m always trying to simplify the vocabulary, simplify the presentation.
I’m not trying to be reductive about the content and the complexity of music, but to try to simplify things to their most basic component and we’ll be talking about some of this in the, in the class, but the idea of even a scale, you know, I’ll have students who have taken lessons for six years, and then they’ll come and they’ll talk to me, they’ll say âI know this sounds like a silly question, but what is a scale? Like, what is a scale?â And I didn’t get that question very often. And the first time I explained it to them, it was kind of a poor explanation because I’m, like, it kind of threw me for a loop. I was like, well, that’s just what we know. That’s the scale. That’s the start.
But it’s not the start. There’s things that go in to build those.
So at popMATICS, we try to. We try to build in the foundation. And from there, through exploring primarily popular styles of music, which has a little bit of a different framework from classical or jazz, it’s got a lot in common, but where they’re different is really fascinating.
And so we find that a lot of people who take music lessons, they’re usually from someone who’s trained in classical or jazz theory. And these little fundamental building blocks that I’ve discovered over the years through my teaching, really, just through my students asking questions and me finding creative ways to answer them, I’ve revealed a lot of things, really, within just the last five years that I’m just, why hasn’t anybody shown me this before? And we get those same comments from our students. They’re like, why didn’t anybody ever show this to me before?
And I find the same thing happens even, I still meet twice a month with my former college professor, and as far as I’m concerned, he’s a musical genius. And he looks at me and he says, where’d you come up with this stuff? And I said, it really just comes from me spending my life teaching. And when I was working one-on-one, any time a student didn’t understand something, I always took that as my responsibility. It was never âWell, everybody else gets it, why don’t you?â
I was always looking for a new way to craft a presentation that might connect with them in a different way. And through doing that and entertaining some ideas that sounded kind of crazy at the beginning, you explore and you find patterns not only on the instrument, but just that are present in music in general that don’t get talked about that often.
So that’s, sorry, that’s a little bit of a long explanation! But I’m kind of thinking through it as you’re asking.
Christopher: No, that was wonderful. You answered about three other questions I had, so that was perfect!
Tony: Oh, great.
Christopher: It’s funny, I don’t want to take us on too much of a tangent, but it reminds me of something we keep talking about in the context of our Next Level coaching program where we’re having people come in, some are at the very beginning, but others have been learning for decades. And it’s just made us even more conscious of the missing pieces in most instrument lessons.
And I never want to throw shade at music teachers or instrument teachers, there are phenomenal people out there, and I admire anyone who devotes their life to music education.
But at the same time, we’ve definitely ended up in this system of inheriting a methodology or an approach to music learning that is missing some fundamental things.
And so then when the teacher gets that question of âwhat is a scale?â for example, unfortunately, I think a lot of them shrink back and they’re nervous and they don’t even try and teach it or they discourage the student. It comes up a lot with improvisation where if the teacher isn’t a competent improviser, they tell the student âoh, improv isn’t a thing for you. Don’t worry. You’ve got to have a gift to do that kind of stuffâ.
And there’s just this terrible feedback cycle of teacher to student, teacher to student, where these whole areas get locked off. But there are, thankfully, instrument teachers, music teachers out there, like yourself, who really take that growth mindset to it. And through developing their own musicality, they figure out the answers that they can pass on to their students, and they reply with âoh, here’s how that worksâ. And they explore it with their students.
So I just want to give you a shout-out and commend you for taking that attitude. And I’m so excited that you’re now turning it into this online platform where you can help more people. I know popmatics.com is the main website, tell us a bit about what people can find there and how they can get involved.
Tony: Yeah, so if you visit popmatics.com there, I think we have a tab⊠Angela can clarify. I think it actually just says âfreeâ. And if you go there, you’ll see what we offer for free.
We have something that we call the Campfire Challenge. That’s ten lessons on creativity at the piano, and it doesn’t matter if you have no experience at all, you will find success with the Campfire Challenge. If you do have more experience, you’ll be able to do more with the instructions that are offered.
So it’s a really fantastic ten-day experience, and each day builds on the next. And that’s where we really try to promote the idea of making trips to the piano or whatever instrument you choose to create on part of the rhythm of your life and just including that in your daily rhythm.
And so they can find that over there, but they can also just find a whole lot about, read a little bit more about what we do and how we try to help people. But if they want to get a live interaction, the Campfire Challenge is a great way to do it.
Angela, is there anything else we should add in with that?
Angela: I guess just like, you know, we do a membership, so we do live classes. Live is a big part of our program, teaching live. So we offer live classes Monday through Friday, and then we also offer a lot of recorded classes for people who can’t make it live.
Or, and some students use both. So that’s if you want to engage with our listening classes, our creating classes, and then our understanding classes, which is sort of Tony’s framework for pop theory, all of that is available for our members.
Tony: Yeah. And so if that is the general curriculum, the way that we have it is we have prerecorded curriculum, popMATICS. It’s the individual concepts one at a time. That’s kind of like your music theory class. That’s your musical understanding.
And then we support that with two live classes every day, one on listening and one on creating. And so we take a new song every day, and we reinforce what we’re teaching from the curriculum in those classes.
And then we have a class where we come and create. And I try to give some constraints so everybody can play in the sandbox, you know, give the kind of give the borders and people play, and we don’t worry about write notes or if we step outside the instructions. It’s all just part of creating.
Christopher: I love it. Well, I can see why our members have been enjoying that so much. And, yeah, I really encourage anyone if you play piano or you want to definitely check out popmatics.com and see what they have going on there.
Tony, I can see we have people lining up in the waiting room for the masterclass, so we should be wrapping things up. Before we do, give everyone a little taste of what you’ll be presenting in the masterclass today.
Tony: Yes, so in the masterclass today, we have three areas we’re going to talk about.
One is we’re going to talk a little bit about pop theory and how it’s different from what you might get with classical theory or jazz theory. Again, a lot of similarities, but we’re going to focus on where they’re different.
And then we’re going to give a little presentation on melody and harmony and treating these as separate elements and talk about how we introduce this to our students and share some of the musical discoveries, the things that I wish someone had told me 20 years ago. And also just give some prompts for how we can create with these.
And then at the end we’ll attach what we’ve learned to a song just so you can hear it within the context of real music. And then we’ll have a Q and A.
Christopher: Fantastic. Well, I can’t wait. We better get the ball rolling.
Huge thank you, Tony, for being our guest expert here this month and for this interview, as well as Angela from the popMATICS team.
We’ll see you next time!
Tony: All right, thanks!
âââ
Christopher: So I hope you enjoyed that, and that it sparked a few ideas for you. Hearing the way Tony talks about these things and how he approaches music making and creativity in particular maybe just rejigged a few things for you.
You can probably see why we’re such fans of his here at Musical U and why we recommend popMATICS so highly.
I’m going to be back tomorrow to share a clip from his masterclass. It’s a bit where he sketches out the major difference between classical, pop and jazz. And the ideas or the information might be familiar to you, but I think you’re going to really love how simple he makes it and how the way he explains it really opens up a gateway for exploration and creativity.
That’s it for this one. Cheers! And go make some music!
Subscribe For Future Episodes!
Enjoying the show? Please consider rating and reviewing it!
The post Creating, Listening, Understanding (with Tony Parlapiano of popMATICS) appeared first on Musical U.
One of our favourite things to see at Musical U is a member exclaiming “Why did nobody ever tell me this?!” Because we’re all about simplifying the complex, and filling in the pieces that can otherwise be totally missing from music learning. Today I want to introduce you to someone else who thrives on simplifying powerful musical ideas, to deliver those kinds of “aha” moments for passionate music-learners: Tony Parlapiano of popMATICS.
from Musical U
http://www.facebook.com/pages/p/412254762289166
from Musical U
http://www.facebook.com/pages/p/412254762289166
“When it comes to improvisation, I like to think that there’s three elements at play: Head, Ear, Hand. And reaction time, as I call it. And I see “head, ear, hand” as what I call the three pillars of improvisation practice, and relating to reaction time. So “jazz reacting” is what I call this. And in many ways, improvisation is a process of reacting. And there’s so many ways that we are reacting when we improvise. Jazz is a process of reacting. Any improvisation is a process of reacting. And my goal with working through this and thinking about how reaction plays into this was to increase the speed of this process – which decreases the reaction time.” â Lorin Cohen, Jazz Bassist and Educator â Watch the full episode: https://musicalitynow.com/283
from Musical U
http://www.facebook.com/pages/p/412254762289166
Can You Learn Perfect Pitch? Should You? (Inside The Book)
Have you ever wished you had “perfect pitch”? To hear a note, and just name it instantly – it can seem like the “Holy Grail” of musicality. But… is it really?
And if you weren’t born with it, is it even possible to learn it yourself?
We’ll be diving into those questions and more, in this episode.
Â
Watch the episode:
Subscribe For Future Episodes!
Enjoying the show? Please consider rating and reviewing it!
Links and Resources
- The Musicality Book
- Book: The Evolving Animal Orchestra, by Henkjan Honing
- Musicality Now: The Biology Of Musicality, with Prof. Henkjan Honing
Enjoying Musicality Now? Please support the show by rating and reviewing it!
Can You Learn Perfect Pitch? Should You? (Inside The Book)
Transcript
Have you ever wished you had perfect pitch to hear a note and just name it instantly? It can seem like the âholy grailâ of musicality – but is it really? And if you weren’t born with it, is it even possible to learn it yourself?
We’ll be diving into these questions and more in in this episode.
Welcome back to another âInside The Bookâ episode of Musicality Now. My name is Christopher Sutton, and I am so excited to share another sneak peek inside the forthcoming Musicality book with you.
Before that, a big thank you to everyone who’s been voting for book covers. We’d narrowed it down to just four options like we talked about in an episode last week, and we’ve had almost 100 people vote and comment on all the designs. It’s been amazing to have that feedback. Thank you so much.
There is one forerunner, one that’s rated highest so far, and we are going to be making that decision later today, so I can’t wait to share that book cover with you.
And thank you again to everyone who took a few minutes to look at the designs and let us know what you thought so that we can pick the very best cover for this exciting new book.
We are going to be opening up for pre-orders soon at musicalitybook.com. If you go there before we open for pre-orders, you’ll be able to register your early interest, and that makes sure you’ll be the first to hear details of that pre-order opportunity, which includes something huge that I am super excited about.
It’s something we’re going to be doing in September to celebrate the book launch and help you to make the most of everything you’ll be learning inside the book. I really wish I could share full details with you right now!
I’m kind of bursting to let you know all about it, but stay tuned for the announcement. And for now, just go to musicalitybook.com and you’ll be the first to know.
So, on to today’s peek inside the book.
I have been finishing up some bits of the Part II chapters recently, and as I read this particular section in the Relative Pitch chapter, I really it really struck me as one of those topics we almost can’t talk too much about at Musical U because it leads so many musicians astray. It did for me back in the day. And it’s a topic that you’ll find a lot of conflicting info about out there.
And as I re-read this section of the Relative Pitch chapter, it made me want to share it more widely and just kind of address the elephant in the room that can otherwise be there.
So let’s dive in. I’m gonna pull up the book.
So just for context, the book is split into three parts. If you’ve watched one of these âInside The Bookâ episodes before, you’ll know.
Part I is all about the foundational skills that make everything you do easier or faster or more joyful in music, and musicality training in particular. And we dived previously into the Singing chapter, and maybe only that one so far. We’ll have to circle back and do another Part I chapter soon!
Then in part II, we look at the kind of nitty-gritty skills you need to unlock all of the seemingly magical abilities of natural musicality. In particular, we talk about ear training and three types of building blocks that let you develop your sense of relative pitch, and then two chapters on the rhythm side of things.
Which all sets you up for Part III, where we get into the more practical, applied skills like improvisation, playing by ear, writing, playing with expression, and performance.
So that’s the structure of the book, and today we’re going to be diving into this Part II chapter on Relative Pitch and one particular section of it.
So I’m going to skip in a little bit, and just to set the context:
âââ
In this chapter, we introduce relative pitch and the three types of building blocks you can take advantage of to develop your own sense of relative pitch. We’ll introduce a process for identifying the key of a piece of music by ear, which will allow you to translate from relative pitch into the corresponding letter names. Finally, we’ll talk briefly about some applications and benefits of relative pitch, which are covered more fully in Part III of the book.
As with many other topics in musicality, if we are to truly understand what does work, we must first get clear on our definitions and address any common-but-faulty approaches which might otherwise lead us in the wrong direction.
When it comes to pitch, the first and most important thing to discuss is our choice of relative pitch as the approach to take. In particular, distinguishing relative pitch from âabsoluteâ or âperfectâ pitch.
Absolute (or âPerfectâ) Pitch
Often when a musician sets out to try learning to recognise notes by ear, they start from the sheet music world of note names and key signatures, and so they assume they would need perfect pitch: the ability to hear a note and automatically know the corresponding letter name. Or to give it a more accurate name, absolute pitch. That’s âabsoluteâ in the sense of being independent from anything else.
As a result, they might do a web search for something like âlearn perfect pitchâ. What they’ll find is a confusing quagmire of myths and misleading information, along with some sensible-sounding but unhelpful methods for learning the skill.
Absolute pitch, colloquially known as perfect pitch, is the ability to name a note you hear without reference to a known note.
So, for example, if you haven’t heard any other music and someone plays a single note on a piano, and you can name that note just by hearing it, for example âthat was an e flatâ, that is using a sense of absolute or perfect pitch. The name âperfect pitchâ is confusing, since it also suggests an infallible ability to name notes with ultimate precision. For example, knowing that a pitch isn’t just an A, but is A432, so 432 Hertz rather than A400, 440 Hertz.
If that term Hertz is unfamiliar to you, don’t worry, we cover it in the active listening chapter when talking about audio frequencies. But the point here is just that the term perfect pitch only makes naming notes by ear seem like even more of a magical and mysterious gift.
The term perfect pitch also gets used in the context of singing, to mean that a singer always hits notes dead-on.
If you’ve read the chapter on singing, then you’ll know that being able to judge pitch precisely with your ears is an important part of hitting notes accurately. But there’s also the vocal control side of things. And in any case, that sensitivity to precise pitch differences is a distinct skill from the absolute pitch we’re interested in here.
For those reasons, although the term perfect pitch is more commonly used, we’ll stick with calling it absolute pitch going forwards.
When we talked about the Talent Myth in the chapter on practicing, I mentioned that there are certain physical traits which can give you an advantage and which you do need to be born with. For example, a basketball player’s height.
In music, having absolute pitch is perhaps the one and only such trait. Estimates vary, but roughly speaking, we’re talking about less than 1% of the general population, perhaps as low as one in 10,000. That’s comparable to the proportion of people who have amusia and are truly tone deaf, so it’s a very rare trait.
It certainly can seem magical. I once knew a musician with absolute pitch who used to have fun by announcing the notes of car horns and other random beeping sounds when we were out and about. That was pretty funny, and it is a beautiful demonstration of how music can be such a core part of somebody that even random sounds have a musical meaning.
It’s not just a party trick, though. Absolute pitch is genuinely useful, by enabling you to recognize note pitches by ear, it directly unlocks the various pitch-related skills of musicality mentioned at the start of this chapter.
So when you meet a musician with absolute pitch who has essentially been able to do all of those things from an early age, like improvising and playing by ear and transcribing music by ear without needing to do ear training, it is impressive. And it can be particularly hard for the average musician to see it as inspiring rather than intimidating.
So, can you learn absolute pitch?
It’s natural to start wondering: if absolute pitch is such a cool shortcut and so useful to the musicians who have it, can you learn it yourself?
The answer is yes⊠but only barely.
The scientific research on the subject shows that in general, you need to be born with absolute pitch, or at least have it from a very young age. It’s not understood what causes it, though there is a higher prevalence in countries where the spoken language is tonal, for example, Mandarin.
It’s also not clear how much it’s nature versus nurture, but anecdotal evidence suggests that both have a role. For example, that musician I mentioned before was born of two parents with absolute pitch, but also, not coincidentally, grew up in a highly musical household, making it hard to piece apart genetics and upbringing.
Based on that, you might think âokay, fine, well, I wasn’t born with it, so never mindâ. But unfortunately, it’s not quite that simple. And this is where musicians get misled.
It is possible to develop some degree of absolute pitch as an adult.
The way I like to explain it is that actually we’re all biologically capable of absolute pitch. It’s just that our brains didn’t think it mattered, so now we don’t interpret sound in that way. But there are clear examples that you can re-train your brain to care about absolute pitch.
One example is in the world of audio. In the chapter on active listening, we talked about it being normal for audio engineers to do ear training, to let them recognize different frequency bands, for example, so that they can adjust the EQ on a recording or live sound equipment and fix problems and enhance the overall mix. That is using a form of absolute pitch where they need to hone in directly on a certain frequency band by ear. Experienced engineers can spot things down to a band that’s just a third of an octave wide, meaning four semitones, corresponding to just a few notes. So they’re not getting as precise as one specific note name, the way we usually think of absolute pitch as working, but they’re getting pretty close. And that third-octave-band skill level is quite common among professional engineers.
A second example is that if you ask someone to sing a song they know well, often they will actually sing it in the correct key. This is known as the Levitin effect, after the author of the scientific paper first introducing the phenomenon. Their highly-reinforced memory for that piece of music has stored the absolute pitches, and they are exhibiting a kind of absolute pitch when they sing the right notes.
That leads on to a third example, which is the one form of absolute pitch ear training which I do recommend as worthwhile, and that’s to memorize a single reference pitch. Some musicians choose the A440 note that orchestras typically tune to. Guitarists sometimes choose the low E string. Pianists often choose Middle C.
The idea is just to pick one pitch and regularly practice trying to remember it and sing it and then check your answer. This can gradually reinforce your memory of this pitch and give you a simple way to do absolute-pitch-like tasks. More on this later when we discuss finding the key of a piece of music by ear.
So should you try to learn absolute pitch?
Clearly, there is evidence that our adult brains are capable of learning absolute pitch. But here’s the thing: to get to the level of instantly recognising any note, and to do it even when there are multiple notes played at once, like in an actual piece of music, is incredibly hard and slow going.
I’ve been studying and working extensively in the area of ear training for almost 15 years now, and I have yet to meet or hear from a single person who has reached this level as an adult.
What I have heard from is hundreds of musicians who have spent months or even years chasing this goal and getting to only a rudimentary level where they can recognise a handful of notes, reasonably reliably, when played in isolation. They generally still can’t apply that to more than the basic musical tasks.
There are a few commonly discussed methods for learning absolute pitch:
One is the simple âguess and check on a regular basisâ mentioned above when discussing learning a single reference pitch. You gradually try to do this with more and more pitches, working up to all twelve and making it reliable across octaves and different timbres.
A second method is to really listen deeply and try to hear the pitch colour characteristic of each note. This was popularized by a very well-known book-and-CD course about 20 years ago. I don’t want to be sued, so I won’t name names! But with this approach you are essentially trying to develop a light form of synesthesia, where your brain interprets one sense with another, in this case feeling or seeing colours when you hear sounds.
The third method is analogous to the reference songs way of learning interval recognition, which we’ll cover in a subsequent chapter. You try to memorise the sound of certain melodies, choosing twelve different reference melodies, each one starting from a different note. Then you rely on your musical brain’s desire to âauto-completeâ to let you recognize the note you hear based on the melody it sounds like it’s about to start.
I could go into depth on each of these. I diligently tried all three myself in my twenties, and I’ve had students try them. I think all that’s worth saying is that they all sound reasonable, and they do all deliver some encouraging early results after a week or two, which might make you think it’s worth persisting. However, as I said before, I have yet to meet a single person who has developed anything close to full absolute pitch who didn’t have it from childhood.
So do you need to learn absolute pitch?
There’s a quote here from Henkjan Honing, a former guest on Musicality Now, the author of The Evolving Animal Orchestra: In Search Of What Makes Us Musical, which is an utterly fantastic book, I recommend picking up.
âAs far as we know, perfect pitch has little to do with musicality. Generally speaking, people who have perfect pitch are no more musical than than those who do not have it. In fact, the vast majority of professional musicians in the west do not have perfect pitch.â
So if you found it discouraging to hear that learning absolute pitch is essentially impossible as an adult, please don’t.
The good news is that of all of the skills which absolute pitch enables, such as playing melodies by ear, recognising chord progressions, composing music, transcribing music, improvising, doing party tricks – there is just one of those where absolute pitch is the only way to do it. Can you guess which?
Yes, it’s the party tricks, like declaring that a car horn or an alarm bell is a B flat And actually, even those are within reach if you use the reference pitch method and the alternative approach to pitch which we’re about to cover.
It’s also worth knowing that, as any musician with absolute pitch will tell you, it does also come with limitations.
For example, if someone relies on their sense of absolute pitch to let them play by ear, it can be quite confusing and challenging if they need to switch into a different key. Or when a band is in tune with each other but not with the âcorrectâ A440 tuning, it can sound unbearably awkward to the musician with absolute pitch, even while the band and the rest of the audience thinks it sounds perfectly fine.
With the alternative approach we recommend, it doesn’t matter what musical abilities you were born with, it doesnât matter if youâre young, middle aged, or retired. It can be adapted to suit any instrument, and it can be used for any pitch-related tasks in your real musical life.
With an integrated ear training approach, as covered in the previous chapter, you can start freely and confidently playing by ear, improvising and more, right from the outset. And it can absolutely get you to the level where other people see what you can do and assume that you must have been born with perfect pitch.
So what is this alternative to absolute pitch? It’s a well developed sense of relative pitch.
âââ
Cool. So from there, we move into talking about relative pitch, what it is, how it works, and how you can go about learning it. Leading on to those three chapters on the building blocks that let you learn relative pitch and develop your sense of relative pitch really quickly.
So that’s the section I wanted to share with you today. Just that kind of myth-busting section on perfect pitch or absolute pitch.
Like I said at the beginning, this can be a real hot topic and a real, what’s the right word? Dead end, really! A dark alleyway for a lot of musicians when they go into ear training wanting to recognise notes by ear. Going down that perfect pitch path can waste an awful lot of time and be really demotivating.
So I knew we had to include that section in the chapter on relative pitch, really, just to frame why relative pitch is the be-all-and-end-all for 99.9% of musicians.
I hope it was useful for you. If you already knew all of this, fantastic. If you’ve wondered about perfect pitch or absolute pitch, if you’ve been tempted to try learning it yourself, or even if you’ve spent some time learning it, I hope that hashes it out for you and makes clear what the opportunity is – or isn’t – and what the better alternative might be.
I may share another section of that chapter on relative pitch another time, but do let me know in the comments, whether you’re on YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, or if you’re listening to the audio podcast, write an email to hello@musicalitynow.com and do let me know what other chapters you’d be keen to peek into on these Inside The Book episodes.
I love sharing these little peeks inside the book with you, and I hope you’re enjoying them too.
That’s it for this one! Coming up this week, we have an interview, a masterclass excerpt, a Coaches Corner episode, and our next Meet The Team interview, as well as one more that I’m excited to share with you later in the week.
Stay tuned for those. Cheers! And go make some music!
Subscribe For Future Episodes!
Enjoying the show? Please consider rating and reviewing it!
The post Can You Learn Perfect Pitch? Should You? (Inside The Book) appeared first on Musical U.
Have you ever wished you had “perfect pitch”? To hear a note, and just name it instantly – it can seem like the “Holy Grail” of musicality. But… is it really? And if you weren’t born with it, is it even possible to learn it yourself? We’ll be diving into those questions and more, in this episode.
from Musical U
http://www.facebook.com/pages/p/412254762289166
from Musical U
http://www.facebook.com/pages/p/412254762289166
How can you memorise chord progressions? đ¶ Coaches’ Corner, with Next Level Coach Camilo Suarez. Watch more Coaches Corner â https://secure.musical-u.com/nlc-coachescorner Learn more about Next Level â https://secure.musical-u.com/nextlevel
from Musical U
http://www.facebook.com/pages/p/412254762289166
“So if you’re a bass player, you understand some of the challenges that we have when we improvising. It’s almost like if we can look at the way a bass player improvises, or some of the restrictions – or not restrictions, but some things that a bass player has to deal with, it can actually help all of us to learn a little bit more. A lot of times when it’s time for us bass players to step up and move away from our background responsibilities, as I call them, and step into the spotlight a bit, what happens is that guitar players or piano players will just sort of stop. Right? And, you know, okay, it’s gonna happen. But so there’s nobody accompanying us, so we have to have a really strong concept of what we’re doing. And dovetailing on that, because we’re not a sax player or trumpet player who is allowed to maybe take a lot more choruses, how many times through the form that you would take your solo on. In many jazz contexts, they may take 15, you know, choruses or something on a blues. The bass player may get five or six, right? So we have to have a really strong concept. We have to really know what we’re doing harmonically. And we have to just be hitting it right out of the gate. So I think those things can be helpful, coming from a bass player’s perspective, some elements about improvisation that can be helpful for anybody. Because the stronger concept you have, the stronger harmonic sensibility, is going to help you either way.” â Lorin Cohen, Jazz Bassist and Educator â Watch the full episode: https://musicalitynow.com/283
from Musical U
http://www.facebook.com/pages/p/412254762289166