Do You Have An “Inner Natural Musician”? Here’s How To Know

New musicality video:

Have you wondered if you have an instinct for music, or worried that you don’t? What if all the seemingly-natural skills of music like playing by ear, improvising, singing in tune, collaborating with others – could be yours.

Not by learning them but by simply connecting with a natural musician that’s already inside you?

In this episode we explain how you can know whether you have an “inner natural” and how to tap into it to unlock these skills for yourself.

Links and Resources

Foundations Of A Musical Mind – https://www.musical-u.com/foundations/

If you enjoy the show please rate and review it! http://musicalitypodcast.com/review

Join Musical U with the Special offer for podcast listeners http://musicalitypodcast.com/join

Let us know what you think! Email: hello@musicalitypodcast.com

===============================================

Learn more about Musical U!

Website:
https://www.musical-u.com/

Podcast:
http://musicalitypodcast.com 

Tone Deaf Test:
http://tonedeaftest.com/

Musicality Checklist:
https://www.musical-u.com/mcl-musicality-checklist 

Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/MusicalU 

YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/c/MusicalU

Subscribe for more videos from Musical U!

Do You Have An “Inner Natural Musician”? Here’s How To Know

Do You Have An “Inner Natural Musician”? Here’s How To Know

Have you wondered if you have an instinct for music, or worried that you don’t?

What if all the seemingly-natural skills of music like playing by ear, improvising, singing in tune, collaborating with others – could be yours.

Not by learning them but by simply connecting with a natural musician that’s already inside you?

In this episode we explain how you can know whether you have an “inner natural” and how to tap into it to unlock these skills for yourself. Stay tuned!

Watch the episode:

Enjoying the show? Please consider rating and reviewing it!

Links and Resources

Enjoying The Musicality Podcast? Please support the show by rating and reviewing it!

Rate and Review!

Transcript

Hi, my name’s Christopher, I’m the founder and Director of Musical U, and this is Musicality Now.

We often talk on this show about your “inner natural”. Having “the instinct” for music.

And all the practical skills that go along with that, like playing notes, chords and rhythms by ear, improvising, jamming and more.

Normally we discuss how to learn those practical skills. But that glosses over something important.

You might think that if you need to learn those skills, it’s because you’re not a “natural musician” and you don’t have the “musical instinct” inside.

But what I want to share on this episode is that this isn’t quite right…

In fact, we all have an inner natural. We all have the musical instinct.

And here’s how you can know.

Humans have been making music for tens of thousands of years. Long before sheet music and notation, long before the instruments we study technique for today. Cavemen were banging drums and dancing around fires, even playing primitive flutes going back to prehistoric times.

Do you think those cavemen worried about whether they had the musical instinct? Or held back from picking up the drum sticks because they didn’t think they had talent?

This may seem like a silly example to look at, but the core point is valid today: those cavemen got involved because they enjoyed and appreciated music. The only difference between them and us is that we have all these culturally-inherited expectations about who is “allowed” to make music and who should be considered a “real” musician.

We can see that clearly by looking at how children today interact with music. Before they start getting indoctrinated about so-called “talent” any child will instinctively dance to music or have fun making noise when handed an instrument.

Again: the only difference between that free and confident attitude to music-making and the typical adult mindset is that we gradually accumulate a ton of misconceptions and false barriers around what it means to be a musician or to be a “natural”.

Take improvisation as a case in point.

Most adult musicians, if you ask them if they can improvise they’ll say “no”. Because in their head they’re taking “improvise” to mean “perform an impressive melody or arrangement on their instrument with no prior preparation, conforming to particular expectations about a music genre like rock or jazz”.

That is a ton of baggage!

What about the question “Could you play a few notes on your instrument without any sheet music?”

Or “Can you stick to a single note and come up with a cool rhythm by yourself?”

Those are both totally valid forms of improvising – and well within the capabilities of any instrumentalist who’s got a grip on the basics of instrument technique.

So what if becoming a “natural” in music isn’t about creating an “inner natural” – but about connecting with the inner natural that’s already there?

Here’s the thing: you already instinctively understand music.

If you didn’t, you wouldn’t enjoy music.

Let me ask you:

Can you tell when music gets more exciting or less exciting?

When it’s fast or slow?

Can you hear the difference between a human voice and a guitar?

Clearly there’s part of your brain that gets all this!

The problem is that it’s not connected up to the parts of your brain that move your fingers on an instrument or control your singing voice.

Because we can’t do things in music we assume we don’t have what it takes.

But we do. Our fundamental musicality is there and it’s at work every time you have an experience of loving hearing music.

So that’s encouraging – but it’s not enough, right?

It’s not enough to let us play by ear, improvise, perform with expression, collaborate easily with other musicians.

To do all those things we need to put connections and frameworks and mental models in place to transform the instinctive understanding of music into an intellectual understanding.

That enables us to consciously draw on that intuitive understanding to choose what notes to play when – and actually express our own musical ideas out in the world.

There is no limit to how advanced you can get with these mental frameworks and connections, and it’s a virtuous cycle: the more you learn, the more you can do, the more you do do, the more you love music, the more you understand music instinctively, and the more connections you can put in place.

This cycle by the way is why we do see some apparently “talented” musicians in the world. That cycle has just happened particularly quickly, or it’s all happened very early in their life. For the majority of us we’ve gained that inner instinct for music but need to take conscious action to put in place the intellectual understanding and mental models to put it all to use.

Putting these mental frameworks in place is what we’re talking about when we discuss ear training or musicality training here at Musical U.

It comes in many forms, from simple repetitive drills and exercises to teach fine-grained skills through to big-picture conceptual understanding, with a lot of learning-by-doing along the way.

It looks different for each and every musician, but it’s always about empowering them to connect with the deep instinctive understanding of music that’s already there.

So never doubt that you have what it takes, or worry that you don’t have an instinct for music.

If you enjoy music, if you love music, if you can appreciate your favourite tracks: you have what it takes.

All that remains is to equip yourself with the tools to translate that inner instinct out into the world in exciting and creative ways. So what are you waiting for?

I don’t often directly promote our products here on the show but I will in this case: We are about to open up our Foundations of a Musical Mind course again – so if you’re looking for an easy and proven way to put in place the mental models that will unlock that “inner natural” for you, head to musicalmindcourse.com.

Enjoying the show? Please consider rating and reviewing it!

The post Do You Have An “Inner Natural Musician”? Here’s How To Know appeared first on Musical U.

How to Earn Your Inspiration, with Mark Cawley

New musicality video:

We’re joined on the show by Mark Cawley, a hit U.S. songwriter whose songs have been hits for artists like Tina Turner, Joe Cocker, Diana Ross and even The Spice Girls. musicalitypodcast.com/181

With over 16 million records to his name, Mark now provides online coaching to songwriters at all stages through his website iDoCoach.com, and has recently released a book, Song Journey, which is a treasure trove of advice and techniques for writing and selling songs, with a liberal sprinkling of personal anecdotes and Mark’s own career lessons along the way.

If you’ve been listening to or watching this show for a while then you’ll know we are big believers that valuable learning often comes in indirect ways – and whenever we have a guest who plays a certain instrument or specialises in a particular kind of musicality, we like to encourage you to stay tuned even if it doesn’t seem on face value to apply to you.

This conversation was equal parts entertaining and enlightening and so we know you’re going to enjoy it, and learn some valuable new ideas for your own musical life.

We talk about:

– How playing alongside Fleetwood Mac brought Mark clarity on what kind of career in music he wanted.

– The four-stage framework which lets you quiet your inner editor and avoid writer’s block.

– And how writing a song for Tina Turner did not result in her recording it – and what he did later on that did actually lead to a Tina Turner hit…

This is Musicality Now, from Musical U.

Watch the episode: musicalitypodcast.com/181

Links and Resources

i Do Coach : http://idocoach.com/

Mark Cawley – “Song Journey” : https://www.amazon.com/Song-Journey-Songwriters-Through-Process/dp/1544514093

Scott Barry Kaufman The 4 Stages of Creativity : https://www.inc.com/jessica-stillman/the-4-stages-of-creativity.html

If you enjoy the show please rate and review it! http://musicalitypodcast.com/review

Join Musical U with the Special offer for podcast listeners http://musicalitypodcast.com/join

Let us know what you think! Email: hello@musicalitypodcast.com

===============================================

Learn more about Musical U!

Website:
https://www.musical-u.com/

Podcast:
http://musicalitypodcast.com 

Tone Deaf Test:
http://tonedeaftest.com/

Musicality Checklist:
https://www.musical-u.com/mcl-musicality-checklist 

Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/MusicalU 

YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/c/MusicalU

Subscribe for more videos from Musical U!

How to Earn Your Inspiration, with Mark Cawley

How to Earn Your Inspiration, with Mark Cawley

Today we’re joined on the show by Mark Cawley, a hit U.S. songwriter whose songs have been hits for artists like Tina Turner, Joe Cocker, Diana Ross and even The Spice Girls.

With over 16 million records to his name, Mark now provides online coaching to songwriters at all stages through his website iDoCoach.com, and has recently released a book, Song Journey, which is a treasure trove of advice and techniques for writing and selling songs, with a liberal sprinkling of personal anecdotes and Mark’s own career lessons along the way.

If you’ve been listening to or watching this show for a while then you’ll know we are big believers that valuable learning often comes in indirect ways – and whenever we have a guest who plays a certain instrument or specialises in a particular kind of musicality, we like to encourage you to stay tuned even if it doesn’t seem on face value to apply to you.

This conversation was equal parts entertaining and enlightening and so we know you’re going to enjoy it, and learn some valuable new ideas for your own musical life.

We talk about:

  • How playing alongside Fleetwood Mac brought Mark clarity on what kind of career in music he wanted.
  • The four-stage framework which lets you quiet your inner editor and avoid writer’s block.
  • And how writing a song for Tina Turner did not result in her recording it – and what he did later on that did actually lead to a Tina Turner hit…

This is Musicality Now, from Musical U.

Watch the episode:

Enjoying the show? Please consider rating and reviewing it!

Links and Resources

Enjoying The Musicality Podcast? Please support the show by rating and reviewing it!

Rate and Review!

Transcript

Mark: Hi, I’m Mark Cawley from IDoCoach, and this is Musicality Now.

Christopher: Welcome to the show, Mark. Thank you for joining us today.

Mark: Thank you, Christopher. My pleasure.

Christopher: So, I was saying to you just before we hit record that I’ve been thoroughly enjoying your book, Song Journey, and the way you weave together a lot of personal anecdotes and backstory with some very meaty and valuable advice on songwriting. I’ve kind of got bits and pieces of your story in my head in terms of your arc as a songwriter and how you came to be a hit songwriter, but I’d love if we could tell a little bit of the early story of how you got started in music and what your early music education looked like.

Mark: Yeah, of course. I’m an upstate New York boy, which means Syracuse, New York, Binghamton, New York, and grew up in the ’60s, and for me and an awful lot of my friends and my generation, pretty much the thing that started it all was the Beatles and Ed Sullivan, because in the U.S. in those days, which is what, ’64, that ages me, that dates me, but it was the Beatles. You’re plodding along as a kid, and all of a sudden that came out, and you looked at it, and again, so many of my friends, excuse me, identified with the same moment. You looked at it and went, “Wow. How do I do that? I mean, that’s incredible. I want to do that.” That was the beginning.

Mark: So, we formed bands, as you do. They’re called garage bands, and it wasn’t GarageBand the digital audio workstation, it was garage band that the guys in the garage, in your parents’ garage, making a hellacious racket trying to write songs and trying to be all-English. I was trying to be Brian Jones. But so were my friends, and you were just banging away, trying this stuff and trying to figure it out. Of course, nobody could write songs, but one of the things again with a lot of my friends of my era that are songwriters and artists that we talk about, that’s really funny, is we would see the British invasion and Motown, and everything was on at the same time, which was also pretty glorious. I mean, all this great music, all potpourri of stuff on the radio was amazing.

Mark: But we would hear these songs that were more sophisticated than we were capable of playing as kids, so that, at least for me, not as many of my friends in bands, but I thought, “I need to figure out how to write a song because I can’t play Procol Harum or whatever. I need to figure out something I can play with my guys in the garage,” and that was the very beginning. So many of the things we know now, like co-writing and recording studios and portable recording wasn’t available, so you really needed some guys and girls to make music with, to make a racket with, and that was certainly the beginning for me.

Christopher: That’s really interesting, so you were there in your garage with your mates, writing songs. How did you find that? Was it a struggle, was it easy, did you study up on a lot of theory to know what chords to put together, or what did that early songwriting look like?

Mark: It was definitely not theory-based. You know, I coach writers, and I try to get back to this kind of feeling with writers of being a kid where you don’t really have a million options to pick from. You pick what you can figure out. You learn a G chord, you learn a C chord and a A minor, and you play them endlessly until you try to reinvent something a little bit. So many of the things that are, again, accessible now were not accessible to at least a kid. Music school, theory, all this stuff. You were just learning. You drop a needle on a record, playing bass or guitar, trying to figure it out. Drop the needle again, figure it out. That was all that was available, but in some ways, it was necessity, the mother of invention sort of idea. You took what was available to you, and you learned from it. But, yeah, that was the beginning of writing songs, and again, most of my band mates kind of … There was a division even as a kid, where I loved writing, that part. Some of my other friends more wanted to be Paul McCartney without learning to play. So there was a fork in the road where I went, “I’m going to pursue this, and lots of your friends in those days went, “I’m going to something else. This is too hard.”

Christopher: Got you, and were you in a musical household, did you have parents who were musicians, or were they sending you to music lessons, or what kind of support did you have?

Mark: No, they … Well, that’s a good story that you ask, because it was kind of funny. I grew up in a household, my dad is from, he’s Irish, but grew up in Glasgow, Scotland and moved to America as about a 16-year-old. He played harmonica, but not professionally. He loved to write, but not professionally. I had three brothers growing up. I’m by far the youngest of the three, all have passed on by now, but three older brothers who did take music lessons, and took it all the way through school into the service bands. Air force bands, army bands, all three of them played and were studied until the moment they weren’t required to play anymore, and then none of them played again, which to me was always hilarious. Like, they’d get out of the air force, and they’d pack up the saxophone, put it under the bed, and it never came out again.

Mark: So, when it got to me, my parents went, “You know what? We give up.” It was the ’60s, and they went, “If you don’t want to do this, don’t do it, or do whatever you want to do, do it your own way,” and so I was the guy who ends up the professional musician out of all the boys in my family. Totally unstudied, just playing it by ear, literally going for it, which is always funny. But my parents were not musical, but they’re incredibly supporting. I grew up in upstate New York where you could legally play in a bar when you were 16. The drinking age was 18, but I was playing in bars at 15 and 16. They’d kind of turn a blind eye to you and let you play, and my mom was amazing because she would drive the car, the band car, sometimes toting a Hammond B-3 behind us, towing it. And she would drive knowing that I shouldn’t be in a club, but helping me pursue this dream, so she would sit outside the club for five hours and read a book by flashlight, and when I’m done, “C’mon. Don’t be hanging around the club. Get in the car, let’s go home.” At that age, you’re all “That’s not my mom. Ugh, this is terrible.” In retrospect, God bless her. I mean, that was incredible. So supportive.

Christopher: Absolutely. And so, when you talk about those bar gigs, were you writing your own songs and performing them there, or were you covering songs at that point, or …

Mark: Oh, always covering songs, sure. At that age you’re playing all the hits of the day, which is a great education as a songwriter and as a musician. You had to learn the stuff, and that was my education. That was my theory, my equivalent of theory, an equivalent of college to me. That was like learning all this stuff … What came later was, as I got a little bit older, maybe 17, 18, still in bands because that’s how you had to get out there and play, I would write some songs, and if the band would allow me to play them, learn them, we would sneak them in. So we’d play a club gig where you were not allowed to play your own songs, because they usually sucked. We’d sneak one in, and somebody’d go, “Have I heard that before?” And you’d go, “You know, that’s like a B-side of like an unknown Led Zeppelin EP,” and people would go, “Oh, okay.”

Mark: So you get called out occasionally, but we’d sneak in a few, and it was an education for me because I thought, “If they go over well within this set of all these known songs, I’m getting there.” And I still to this day, writing songs and coaching writers, talk to them about doing that, creating kind of a song sandwich where you take pretty well-known songs and put yours in there in a playlist, play them all, see how you fare. Are you holding up? The moment I thought, “I’m getting there,” that was a big moment. To think, “Yeah, these are pretty good.” You know?

Christopher: It’s so interesting that you point to that experience of learning the songs of the day, and performing them regularly, as them being a good education for you. We just came off the back of a Beatles month here on the show where we were talking exclusively about the Beatles, and of course their years in Hamburg were very much like that, performing the covers and tuning their ear into how songs work so that even if they never studied theory, they had that internal understanding. It sounds like you were doing a similar thing.

Mark: It’s like our Malcolm Gladwell moment, the 10,000 hours. The Beatles did it, I did it. A lot of writers, a lot of musicians I know did it. It was the only thing you could do to get out there.

Christopher: And I love the way you talk about it in your book in terms of studying the songs of the day. I think a lot of people get a bit anxious about not exposing themselves too much to other music in case it spoils their own creativity and that kind of thing, but you talk very clearly about if you’re going to be out there pitching your songs, you need to understand what that environment is like in terms of the pop landscape or whatever genre you’re working in. You need to have listened to the songs of the day and adapted or adopted what you can from them into your own songwriting.

Mark: I think of that as deconstruction, which I didn’t understand the term when I was a kid, but now, to me, that means you deconstruct the current hit. It doesn’t mean you copy one, it only means you assimilate it. You learn it, you figure out … The term I always like using, it gets in your DNA as a writer. You think, “Okay, that song that is so successful did this. Structurally, lyrically, melodically, they did this, and let me just get it at least in the back of my mind.” It could be as simple as when your song is almost done you look at the structure and go, “Okay, I’m not hearing anything that has five verses in it anymore.” That’s just in your DNA now from deconstructing current music, and you go, “Well, let me at least take what I’m doing make it more palatable, edit it a little, make it more in-sync with what’s on the radio.” Again, which doesn’t mean you cater to or you dumb down, any of those terms. To me, it means you just are aware of it because that’s only smart, I think, for a songwriter.

Christopher: For sure. Yeah, that pragmatism comes through really clearly in your book, and it’s something I very much appreciate, the kind of down-to-earth practicalities of songwriting as well as the wonderful, more intangible creative aspects. We touched there on a couple of themes I really want to dig into, one of which is inspiration, and the other is editing, but before we move on, I do want to ask, were there any kind of breakthrough moments? You were there playing bars and gigs. Somehow, sometime later you were this hit songwriter, you are this hit songwriter. What happened in between?

Mark: Life. A lot of life. Seriously, you learn this stuff, and I think sometimes the difference between … If I go talk to some of the guys and girls I grew up with that were interested in music, usually, as I mentioned earlier, there’s a period where they drop off. To me, that drop off was to either jump or you settle, and I don’t mean settle in a bad way. Some of my friends had a family, they got a great job, and that’s where they should be. For me, it was a jumping point, and that’s what made the difference. I grew up in upstate New York, and I’ve gone as far as I can go. I talked to a band literally from Indiana who had a record deal that had heard me and said, “Would you come write a few songs?” I shut my place down in upstate New York and got on a Greyhound bus with a Marshall amp packed in the bottom, and a bass guitar and a guitar, and just went. And thought, “I had no plan B.” Ever.

Mark: I jumped in, and looking back, those are the big moments. I could have settled or I could’ve jumped, and when I jumped, it forced me to sink or swim. Not to use cliches, but it does. There’s a David Bowie quote I always loved about creativity. He said, “I don’t feel like I’m really creative unless it’s like walking out into the ocean. The minute I know I’m in a little too deep, that’s the creative zone to me.” Anything else is like, “Nah, I’m okay here.” You got to risk, I think. I hope that answers your questions, but those became the places where I can look back now and go, “I grew because I made myself.” I moved to LA, I moved to London, years and years ago finally to Nashville. You hold yourself up against the competition, and you start to go, “All right, this is where I need to do or this is where I am.” Those are big moments in your songwriting or musician life.

Christopher: In those early years, you were playing the part of performer, artist, and songwriter to an increasing degree. Was it clear to you that songwriting was the path forwards for you, or were you tempted to be the front man or the band member as much as much as that?

Mark: You kindly mentioned the book a few times, and I think there are two episodes in there that sort of zero in on this idea. And again, a lot of my generation, you looked at the Beatles and thought, “That’s all I want to do. I got to do that. I got to be MTV, I got to be chased by gobs of women or something,” whatever your vision of that was. That’s all you knew. I thought, “If I’m playing music, that’s the goal. I got to do that,” so I finally joined a succession of bands, get better and better, and I joined a band called Faith Band from the Midwest who had a record deal, and all of a sudden get a big record deal.

Mark: Now we have one hit single called Dancing Shoes, and we are opening up for … I don’t know if they’re my idols, but the bands of the day, Fleetwood Mac, Hall & Oates, Doobie Brothers. We were opening for everybody, and that was a gut check to me, because I always loved writing songs, and I never questioned that I wanted to be a star. But now I’m face-to-face and a few feet away from Fleetwood Mac for a few nights, for instance, and I’m looking at them and going, “That’s the real deal. That is, what goes into that, that is something else.” And I thought, “Do I have that?”, and that’s a gut check, a real gut check. You go, “Am I that good? Am I that driven? Am I that self-possessed, in some cases? Is that what I want?”

Mark: I grew to be friends with some of the people that you’re dealing with, and you think, “Uh-oh. They may not have a home life. These guys and girls are away from home. They give up a lot for that limelight,” and that became my first real inkling of, “Yikes. Do I want to do that, or do I like writing songs?” So I’m still in this frame of mind, right, and this went on for probably a few years. Not consciously all the time, but finally I started making different decisions. I quit the band that had had some success and moved to LA, one of the jump periods, and held the only real job I’ve ever had in my life other than music, which was Bullock’s Department Store in Sherman Oaks. I moved to LA full hubris, whatever the term you want to use, and also then went, “Oh, I have no job.” I was used to floating along, playing in bands, getting paid up and down.

Mark: Now, I’m selling shoes in a department store and thinking, “Wow, is this what I’m … Where are we now?”, but again, those jumping-off points made a difference, and it also really let me know the value of what I’m doing, but the end of this idea, the end of this part of the story is during this time of scrambling, I had a couple of songs cut by other people, primarily Diana Ross, and at the time … I mean, she’s still a legend, but at the time, for a young songwriter, that was incredible. So, now I’m thinking, “Wow, how could I do this and just not have to go out on the road, and not get onstage, not go through the whole other lifestyle that I’m not sure about?” Because, as I said, now I had given it up. I really took a shot up, going, “I did that. I don’t know where I’m going to go, but I’m going to quit, and I’m going to go see what happens if I go to LA.”

Mark: Now I’m seeing maybe the songs are the best part of what I do, and maybe that is the way forward. So it took a little bit of traction, let’s call it that, and a couple of things happening, that moved me forward away from the artist path and into the songwriting path.

Christopher: Cool, and one of the things we love to do on this show is to take these ideas or topics in the world of music that are kind of clothed in mystery and intrigue and airy fairy magic, and try and dissect how much is there clear, practical explanation behind that magic. Not to detract in any way from the magic of music, but just to understand what’s possible for any one of us as a musician. The story you just told, I’m sure someone could take that and go away and tell it in a way which was Mark Cawley, gifted young songwriter went all in, pursued his dream, immediately had a couple of hit songs with Diana Ross and never looked back, and tell it in a very easy way.

Christopher: I wonder if we could just, maybe the Diana Ross songs you mentioned are a good example, and we could just focus in and show behind the closed doors of what actually went into that in terms of writing those songs. Was it a flash of inspiration and they were immediately fully formed, did you just throw in a demo tape to a recording label on Monday, and you had a hit song by Friday? What went into that success?

Mark: That’s a really good question because, and let’s use the Diana Ross song because that is a … You and I were joking before we started the interview that I’m old enough to be dead honest. No one’s going to come after me or change my career at this point. So, when that happened, the Diana Ross thing was a real lesson in music business. I had hooked up with an entertainment lawyer who was huge in LA, and was actually the lawyer for a friend of mine, because I was doing nothing, but I managed to get in the meeting. He liked my songs and said, “I have clients like Diana Ross. Let’s see where we go here.” So, this is my first big experience with writing, and this is just unique, it’s not this way all the time, but he said, “Okay, you’re going to write a song with Diana Ross.” I thought, “Wow. Let’s prep for this. I’ve been prepping for this my whole young life, let’s go. I know Motown, I know Beatles and Stones. I know all this influence.”

Mark: He said, “Here’s a list of titles from Miss Ross, and call her Miss Ross if you deal with her,” which was also unusual to me at the time, but at that time, you’re going, “Anything. Of course. Yes, let’s go.” The lawyer said, “She would like a song a little bit like an old Motown song, and here are lists of titles.” Now, I picked one called Shockwaves, and I thought, “That puts me in mind of Martha and the Vandellas, “Heatwave”, that kind of stuff,” so I went right down that road, which you do as a songwriter a lot of the times, you start with maybe a bit of the obvious, or a bit of where an artist has already been, and you try to go out from there. This is something you and I can talk about a little deeper later, I think we will, but at that point in life, I went, “I’ll write something I think she’s going to like based on what she’s asking for.”

Mark: Now, this, I’m not knocking her, but this happens, it still happens to this day. I wrote the song with her and a guy named Bill Ray, who is a friend and helped connect this, but primarily, I wrote it. I’m happy with it, I think it kind of fits, we send it in, everybody loves it including Diana, so I’m thinking, “This is easy.” And now I get a call saying, “Well, Miss Ross would like to change the percentage of the song.” At that age, you’re thinking, “What? No. Pay me fairly,” but the other part of you goes, “Who am I? I really need this, so what’s the deal?” And again, I’m not knocking her. It goes on all the time, and I understand the leverage involved.

Mark: I had to make a decision. Would I give her more of the song, or would I be stubborn and go, “You can’t have my song?” Because now I feel it’s, I’ve done a lot on it, you’re not going to do this. But the music business can be a bit brutal, so long story short, down the pipe comes the idea of, “If you say no, probably not going to be on the album,” and I’m thinking, “I need this break,” so as happens with young writers and young artists, you give up. You kind of go, “Whatever you want. Sure. Make sure my name is spelled correctly. Let’s go.” So I did. The funny part of the story too is that I’m still thrilled, and it was still an okay deal, and it’s still a huge break, so I was very grateful, and she did the record with Tom Dowd, who is a hero of mine. Worked with Aretha and everybody.

Mark: The end of the day, I wasn’t thrilled with it, which is also something that I can say now I probably wouldn’t have said then. The part who is on me, I looked at it and thought, “I wish I’d written a better song.” I kind of catered to what I thought she had done before and would like, and I learned later as a songwriter without a doubt, go for it. I mean, go for what you want to do, not what you think they want, and if you do it well enough, hopefully you knock them out, and I did have that experience down the road. Didn’t know that then. So, the outcome was okay, and it was certainly helpful to me, but it was not the song I wanted to write later in life.

Christopher: I see. Well, that’s definitely a theme I want to return to is writing songs for yourself versus writing them for an artist or for the success you think they’ll have, but that’s a really interesting insight into the kind of business landscape you were thrust into. What about the creative side of that song you said you were writing with Miss Ross, and did it just pop into your head in the course of a day, was there a songcraft behind it that spanned weeks? How did you reach the point where you had it at the song?

Mark: Yes, songcraft, and I think the idea was that, and I would do this to this day, you do your homework. That’s part of the craft. I thought, “Okay.” I’d been paid enough attention that I was kind of ready for this, and I thought, “Let’s see what keys she tends to sing in. What kind of things does she sing about? Let’s make sure I don’t get knocked out here because she doesn’t get it.” So, yeah, you do some homework, basically. Yeah. You kind of look for things that you think they might like to talk about. Again, keys, just tempo, things like that. You do some homework, and then it’s inspiration. For sure. You set your parameters a little bit, and then let it go. Like, I didn’t do this at this time, but I did in later years all the time. I’d get a drum loop, for instance, that would put me in the groove of where I need to go, and I’m going to let that sucker play all that long so that I can’t get out of it. I’m at this tempo, I’m in this vibe. I’m going to keep playing here and keep playing here so I know I’m at least, I’m good in this area. From there, it’s certainly inspiration, and in the case of that song it was pretty quick, I think.

Christopher: Your mention of loops there reminds me of another great story from the book talking about the hit you had with Billie Piper, who for someone like myself who’s a Brit, is a household name. I don’t know how big she was internationally, but she was top of the pop scene for a fair while there. Maybe you could just tell the story there of how there was a particular loop that kind of gave you the spark to go off and write a melody there?

Mark: I’m happy to, yeah. That used to be behind me. I was joking with you that our house, we’re selling our house and moving to another house, so all the records are gone, but that used to be behind me. It was more fun to look at. But, it was a great story, because I was signed as a writer, which I have been three different times, to London publishers. In this case, Steelworks in Sheffield. Not exactly London, but. And Steelworks was a bit like Motown was when I was a kid. It was a factory in the best sense. They would have artists come through the door, the writers were in-house, they would write with the artist, the artist would go in and do preproduction, still in the same facility. Do the album in studio A, and they’d go home, and the whole thing is crafted from beginning to end in one facility.

Mark: Now, I was a rarity because I lived in the States, in Nashville at that point, and still do, but I was signed to the Steelworks. So, I would go maybe four times a year and write with artists that were there, like Spice Girls and people like that. In this case, though, I’m back in Nashville, and my friend Elliot Kennedy, who’s incredible producer and writer, just one of the best, he’s in charge of the project. He runs Steelworks kind of, it’s his thing. And he calls and says, “Hey, we got Billie Piper in the studio,” and as you mentioned, she’s huge not so much in America, but at the time, Britney Spears equivalent for Americans, for sure. Big pop star, and I knew it, knew of her. He said, “She’s in the studio. We’ve got most of the album cut. We don’t have a single. Do you have anything?”

Mark: I thought, and I explained it in the book, and it’s very true. Songwriters tend to do, “Of course I do. Let me go find it.” I had no idea. Although I knew it needed to be uptempo, Elliot said, “We need something uptempo. Very poppy, but different.” Because we’ve been through, as happens with singles on albums, usually, they’ve heard everything. And if they haven’t found it, they’re looking for something they don’t know what it is. You got to supply something they go, “Oh, wow. That’s brilliant. Love it.” And talking about loops like we were, I was always using loops and playing with loops, and previously, I’d been published by Miles Copeland, who used to manage Sting, Police, ran a record label, and was just an amazing music guy, and I would quiz him about Sting, because I love Sting’s writing, and he said Sting would go assimilate himself into a culture, and then come away, he’d learned things. He’d learned how the music was put together. Then he’d bring it into his own thing. He wouldn’t copy it, he, again, assimilated into his music.

Mark: Desert Rose was a good example, which I love. That was so unique at the time, right? So, I’m aware of that, and I’m listening to Moroccan music, I’m listening to East Indian things, not knowing what I’m going to do with them other than I just want them to seep in. So, I was in the middle of that, this call comes, I’m working away, I’m working with a drum loop because it has to be uptempo, so I start there, and I start to sing and play a variation of what I’d been hearing, which is a little bit different than pop, but I still, to be honest, I got nothing. So as I said in the book, I just thought, and you still do as a songwriter, musician, you go, “Let’s get out of my environment, go somewhere for a little bit,” but the pressure was on. They’re in the studio, and I’m thinking I’ve got to figure out something.

Mark: So I go to the grocery store, and I walk in the store, and a melody starts to formulate. And I thought, “This is fairly well-developed, and kind of unique, and I must have stolen it.”. If it’s that good … You know, the Paul McCartney story of Yesterday is identical. He said he played it for people out of superstition. He said, “I dreamt this. Do you know this song?” Until people went, “No,” and he finally went, “Okay, I really did dream it. It’s mine.” But you have that moment of, like, “This is too good.” This is before iPhones, so I call my phone, answering machine, I lay it down, I sing it into the machine. Sing it all the way back from the grocery. Lay down a very rough version of it, and send it to Elliot. Elliot calls back and goes, “We’re doing the song now. We’re finishing it,” and that song was recorded, I think same day or the following day, finished, and debuted at number one in England. That’s as good a songwriting story as I could make up. It’s never happened since. Most writers I know don’t have that one. That was an immediate, it all just happened.

Mark: But again, when I coach writers, I stress the business part of it. Knowing the business, knowing the connections and the network. If Elliot was not recording Billie Piper, I have nowhere to go with this idea. So all this work from being a kid to getting to the networking, to getting a publishing deal put this in place for me to utilize all the stuff I’d been learning, all right?

Christopher: Yeah, there’s so much packed into that story, and I think-

Mark: Well, part of it I want to share, Christopher, sorry, I don’t mean to interrupt. One thing I tell writers is that some writers get very bitter and say, “Well, my stuff is as good as what’s on the radio. Why am I not a hit songwriter, a hit artist?” It’s that. It’s usually that there’s so much background that went into the moment that got somebody into the moment where they could show what they could do, and that’s necessary.

Christopher: You had a really interesting section in the book about how writers are often by nature introverts, and how that can make networking, as you refer to there, a bit of a challenge. What advice do you have for someone who feels like, “Ugh. Networking is not me. I don’t want to be schmoozing and trying to find my way into the right circles. I just want my songs to be out there”?

Mark: Another great question, and timely, because in a lot of what I wrote in the book, through coaching people, I really wanted them to know things maybe that I didn’t do well that I’m aware of now. Some that I did, some I didn’t. Networking to me was not an inherent thing. I have some, and you do too I’m sure, you have friends who are very outgoing, and they’re right in your face, and they’re the life of the party, and there are songwriters and artists that are that way, too. If you’re not, you would depend on someone to do that for you, almost. A publisher, a publicist, a manager. So I was lucky enough to, in the peak years of writing for me, to know good publishers. And because I was not very comfortable throwing myself right in the middle of something to go, “Look at me, look at me, look at me, look at me,” which you almost have to do.

Mark: So I was somewhere in between. I could do it a bit comfortably sometimes, but really, a lot of the songwriters who had been very successful have an element of that. They have an element of being extroverted or somehow force themselves to be extroverted when they need to be. I have a friend who, I won’t give you these names, but it’s kind of funny. I have a friend who is incredibly successful country writer and wrote with, as a teen, and she would always tell me that they would go to parties and the other songwriter of the team would be right, like, if they met you, they’d go, “Christopher. Hang on a second, I got a song for you. Wait a minute, you got to hear this,” and they’d have a cassette or a CD, and they’d shove it right in your face. And my friend said, “It just freaked me out. I couldn’t do that. I would just die away from it and couldn’t put myself out there.”

Mark: And I guess the lesson is you network and you find at least a comfort zone of doing that. Social media now is a huge help. You can post your songs, you can do a lot from your room. You can get music out there, and that’s a big help. But I would say, back to the advice thing, networking is essential. Somehow you’ve got to find a way for people to hear what you do, or it won’t be successful, and if that’s going to a party, if that’s going to a workshop … Also good things. There’s so many of those out there now. I really urge writers, go to workshops, go to places where you might meet somebody who knows somebody who knows somebody. As I talked about in the book a lot, there’s music, and there’s the music business. You and I are now talking about the music business, so that requires networking and some work.

Christopher: I’m really glad we touched on this, because I know that in this day and age, if you are an introvert, it’s very easy to say to yourself, “I’ll just put it out there. I’ll put it on Spotify, and my work is done.” Or, “I’ll throw it out on YouTube, and people will find it if it’s good enough.” And clearly, you still place a huge value on that personal connection and the established music industry, as it were.

Mark: I think that the key, Christopher, is probably to just have a plan. Maybe that plan incorporates the way you are as a person. Maybe your plan is that, “Okay, I need to network via social media,” but have a plan. The writers that I coach that worry me in the beginning, they go, “I write just for me. I write to write.” I’ll early on say, “What’s the expectation?”, and they’ll go, “I don’t know. Make a million dollars? To be a star?”, and you go, “Is there a plan for this?”, and sometimes they go, “Nah, that’s why I’m talking to you.” Fair enough, but I’m still going to say we need to figure out how you’re comfortable plotting this thing you want to do. Because it takes, it’s planning. For sure.

Christopher: To come back to the Billie Piper story, I think what made it stick in my head so much was there is so much packed in there, apart from the business side, is that kind of flash of inspiration and instant success, which is great, but there’s also the fact that you were immersing yourself in a particular sound that very directly lead to that inspirational breakthrough, and I have a notebook full of snippets and highlights from your book, and there are several on inspiration that really jumped out at me. One was a quote you shared from Rodney Crowell that “inspiration is earned”, which I thought was a really beautiful way of putting it.

Mark: Great quote, yeah. That’s great.

Christopher: And you also talked about how you can’t base your career in songwriting on inspiration, and so it’s clear that you do believe in inspiration, and you put value in it, and it’s been a part of your own journey, but I’d love if we could just to start to unpack some of the practicalities of the creative process, and what guidance you give in the book, and the kind of toolkit you’re equipping musicians with when it comes to going from zero to polished song.

Mark: Well, let me start from the start. If I were coaching you today, you came to me and said, “I’m a songwriter,” or an artist, I coach artists as well, but let’s talk about songwriting, creating a song. I would, number one, say, “Let’s create a ritual for you,” meaning let’s pick a time that you are going to show up all the time so that you value this thing we’re trying to do, because I think a lot of times, beginning songwriters especially, go, “Well, all right, all day long on Saturday, and then I don’t do it again for a while.” It’s pretty easy to look at that and go, “It’s not working, is it? Because it’s fragmented.” So, my advice for beginning is take two hours, pick a time you can show up, and show up. And then everything we talk about will play into the two hours. When the two hours are up, stop. I would give the same advice to a musician, someone trying to do this as a recording musician, or touring musician, or artist, is put concentrated shorter time in in the beginning.

Mark: Also, this is probably the biggest one to me as a lyricist, is that, and it plays into your point, I think, many songwriters I talk to in the beginning say, “Well, I only write when I’m inspired,” and I cannot help but go, “How many songs have you written? Because, wow.” It’s usually not many, and it’s like, well, this is the difference between someone who does this for a living, myself, people I know, you have to up that game somehow. You’ve got to find the inspiration, you can’t wait for it to hit you. So, you need tools. Not rules, but tools. One of the best ones I ever heard early on was to look for titles. They can be lines, they can be titles, but the way to find them, I’ll share the value of them, but to begin with, what I have done over the years always is take, now it’s an iPhone, but it used to be a pad and a pen, and go to a bookstore.

Mark: Walk up and down the isles endlessly. Go to a library, do the same thing. Watch TV and movies, same thing. Any time something caught my eye or my ear, it’s on the list. I just keep adding them, adding them, adding them, adding them. Then, when I sit down to write, rather than go, “Okay, I’m here, inspire me, muse,” I’d go, “What do I have on the list? Oh, there’s a title. There’s an idea. There’s something kind of fun.” That’s the difference to me is to, and that’s what Rodney Crowell’s alluding to, is that it’s earned. I earned that inspiration by spending, how would I put it, intentional time. I intentionally went and sought things that might come into play in my songwriting, all the time. Treated that as, and I still do, as part of the job. The job is not sitting and playing guitar and playing drum loops and playing keyboards and singing all the time. A lot of times, it’s like grunt work. It’s like going, “Let’s watch a movie,” and just see as a line pops up.

Mark: Because movies and television are made to have hook lines in them, and so are book titles. Book titles I love because they are made to do what a good song title does. You look at a book title and you think, “I’ll at least pick it up, flip it over and see what are they doing here.” Good song titles are like that, too, and for a beginning writer, a good song title is gold. That’s a whole nother road to go down, but talking about methodology again, I’m going to look for things to write about, and I’m going to look for a set amount of time that I know I’m going to show up. I’m going to start to utilize everything that I’ve been learning, but I’m certainly going to look at that list at some point and go, “I’m not inspired today. If I am great, then I don’t need this.” 99 out of a hundred times, you’re not. You’re looking for inspiration, and that hard-earned inspiration Rodney Crowell talks about is on my page. I’m looking for something to write about.

Mark: Now, if I do that, the next step for me is to write prose, and think, “Okay, before I just jot down everything in this world, what is this idea about?” That accomplishes a couple of things for a writer. You can write down prose and you can go, “Okay, zero this in, and let’s go. This makes it clear to me what to write about and what not to write about.” The funnier part of it to me is early on, I thought sometimes it saves me a lot of time. I’ll have a great title, I’ll write prose, and go, “I don’t think there’s anything here, because I can’t find it. Next,” and I’ll move on. So, looking for titles, looking for prose, having intentional time to write, those are really biggies.

Mark: One thing I would add too for a songwriter right now is when you have that idea of what you’re going to write about, take a second and think of a second concept. Second concept of writing is a level up, and it’s a great thing to do. For instance, if you’ve got an idea, I’ll give you a very quick story, but I have a client who I asked to do everything we’re talking about. The next week, I talked to her and say, “Find any titles or lines?” She read me a few, and one of them was called, 30 seconds from religion. I said, “That’s what I’m talking about. That’s interesting, what is that?” She said, “I have no idea.” So, that’s your first concept. She said, “Okay, I guess it is someone who’s probably in an old-age home, assisted living in the U.S., one of those kind of things, and they’re literally ready to meet their maker. They’re 30 seconds from religion, however you view it.”

Mark: I said, “Well, that’s not only not very uplifting, but it’s a first concept. Is there something else?” She said, “Not that I have.” I said, “Okay. Next week,” and I coached her every week as I do with some writers in the beginning, and I said, “Next week, your job is to have a second concept. Put the first one aside. What do you got?” Next week, she’s got a whole finished lyric that is now a country lyric about a woman who lives in a small town, still called 30 Seconds from Religion, and in the story, she’s married to what we call a God-fearing man. They go to church together, they have kids, they all sit in the same seat in church, they listen to the preacher, he’s a good guy. Good family. Then he has an affair and goes off and loses his mind. He’s having an affair in a small town, because it’s a country song. So she knows it, and she’s embarrassed, and now she’s ready to literally take the guy out, probably kill him. It’s country, again.

Mark: So, now in this song, you get to the chorus, she’s talking to the guy and goes, “Either you’re back in church with me this Sunday, in the pew, listening to the word of God from the preacher, or you’re up there in a pine box. Either way, 30 seconds from religion.” That’s like, that’s a second concept. That’s a brilliant one. And those are huge, it’s the difference between a song that somebody sometimes goes, “That’s nice,” or they go, “Oh, whoa. That is interesting.” All stemming from … I’m a title writer. I love titles. Not every writer is, some of my best friends who are really successful are not. Most of them are. Most of them are title writers and chorus writers first. So, there’s the last technique I might mention is too, I know Bryan Adams a bit, and talked to him one time and said, because he’s written so many hits. I said, “How do you write songs?”, and he said, “Chorus first. Always.”

Mark: I said, “Not me. Why do you do that?”, and he looked at me like I was stupid. He’s very direct, and he’s brilliant, but he looked at me and said, “You don’t have a hit chorus, you don’t have a hit song. So what are you doing?” Big point. I still don’t write a chorus first all the time, but I sure pay attention to them.

Christopher: Terrific. I love that story, well, both of those stories, and I love that it gives an insight, I think, into the role of a coach for a songwriter. I’m sure that’s something we’ll talk a bit more about in a moment. I would normally say I’m not a songwriter, but at the beginning of your book, you make the point that if you’ve written even a few songs, you are a songwriter, and you should call yourself one. And so, I won’t say that, I will say I’m a songwriter to some extent, but I very early on hit what to me was quite a big barrier. I think now, 10 years, 20 years on I might be a bit smarter about it, but at the time, what I hit was that inner editor, the inner critic, that almost as soon as I wrote down a lyric, I was like, “Oh, that’s not very good. Oh, I better change that.” It made everything very slow and frustrating and, I don’t know, disheartening, and I love the way you talk about the role of the editor voice in your book, and where it does and doesn’t have a place. I wonder if you could share a bit about your perspective on that.

Mark: I’ll be happy to, and I will share with you too that the thing you described is the most common thing I deal with in talking to songwriters of almost any stature or anything. Sooner or later, that bites you. Me, too. Everybody. The editor is two things to me. It is the devil when it comes in too soon, and the total opposite when you need it. It’s the sum quotient of all the things you’ve learned when it’s good. You think, “Okay, I’ve written a song,” and amateur writer might go, “I’m done. Done is fun, I’m done, this is done.” Pro writer goes, “Okay, now I’m going to edit, and I’m going to use all the things I’ve learned and look at this and go, ‘What do I do? Should it be better, are the things …’” That’s good editing. Bad editing is what we all deal with that you described. That is the, now, I always picture it as a little guy on your shoulder, that’s been done many times, but it’s a little guy going, “Really? You think this is good? Sure this is good? You’re going to keep doing this?” No matter how enthused you are when you start, if the editor sneaks in too early, you can pack it in. You can either pack it in for real that day or whatever, hopefully not worse …

Mark: But the editor, it has a place, but the place is not early, and where we usually all fall down, me included, is the editor sneaks in, and editor is a critic, and it’s self-doubt to the point … It could be anything. It could be the self-doubt of, like, I don’t know if the idea is good. I’ve been with writers who have gone through the process, who are successful writers, and the editor gets him so bad they might stop and go, “I don’t even think I’m any good. I don’t know how I ever wrote a song in the first place. I can’t do this. No one’s ever going to record this song. What am I thinking of?” And they’re done for the day, hopefully. But there are, this was not my idea, but in a creative writing course I came across four stages, and that’s been something that helps me visualize this process, and that is to look at four stages of writing.

Mark: One is preparation, which is what we just talked about. Preparation to me is preparing to write. That’s going to a bookstore, watching a movie intentionally, television, eavesdropping, going to restaurants, listening to conversations, that’s all prepping to maybe write an idea. Second stage of this is incubation, which is also huge. That’s where second concepts come out of, usually. You let the idea sit, you don’t insist on writing it. You go, “What could it be?” Let it sit around for a while. Maybe 30 seconds from religion is not somebody dying, it’s somebody ready to kill their husband. That’s incubation. Number three and number four are biggies. Number three is illumination, which is something we have not talked about, but illumination to me means you write the real stuff that’s in your head. If you have an idea, you don’t try to rhyme and make it all pretty, and say, “Look, I’m a writer. Isn’t that nice?”

Mark: You think, “What is the real stuff?” If it’s a time of day, what time of day? If it’s a woman, what’s she wearing? Describe it. Show it. I mean, the Nashville term that’s very right-on is show, not tell. Show me an idea. Like a painter, paint it. That’s where that comes in. Illuminate. Shed light on your idea in the very best idea. Number four, verification. That’s the editor. That’s the critic. If you think of it as stage four in your writing, you’re way better off. Me, too. If I think, “Okay, I’m not going to edit. I’m not going to do this until I’ve done all the other things. Have I prepared, did I let it sit, am I writing the real stuff? Now, let’s edit.” Any time those things get out of one through four, it’s food for thought. Especially the number four. You could probably do this. If it gets in your head, these things, you start thinking, “Okay, I’m in trouble now because I have an idea, I didn’t really let it sit around, I’m editing right from the first second, third line. I’m in trouble. I’ve moved four up to two.”

Mark: If you can think in those terms, some days, it will save you. It’s really good. You think, “Okay, let’s stop. Back down to number four. Let’s quit judging. Let’s just shed light.”

Christopher: I love that. Yeah, looking back, if it’s preparation, incubation, illumination, and verification, as a teenager, I was just doing number three. I was like, “Let’s write the real details. Oh, and now let’s edit.” Those are number three and four. Brutally lacking thought.

Mark: You were doing better than me. I mean, number three to me was not really … I had to learn that one. In Nashville, probably. Because I don’t know that I had a number three. I would just go, “Let’s write a song, and now I know how to rhyme, so look at me go.” You’d write it and go, “I got a song. What do you think?”, and the people who can’t write a song go, “You are a genius.” First time I sat with a publisher, they went, “Wait a minute. What’s going on here? What’s that? How come there’s a cat in here? What happened to the woman in verse two?”, and you’re going, “Are you not looking at the rhyming I did?” Publishers, it was the very first line of them going, “I’m a listener for you.” That’s what a publisher does. That’s what I do coaching, too. I go into listener’s seat and go, “You lost me, or you got me, or whatever.”

Mark: But yeah, I didn’t know how to show the real stuff. I would just make up craft, and writers that learn just craft and they stop there, I wrote about them in the book, they can be tools in the worst way. There’s a very American term of, “You’re a tool,” meaning you’re a piece of work, because they will learn rules and they’ll stop there. They go, “No, no, no. Can’t do that. You can’t do this. You can’t do that.” That’s the death of creative songwriting. It’s terrible. You got to be able to play. So my point was, I’m laughing because I wrote a lot of bad songs without writing the real things in the song. I just wrote to be clever, to rhyme, and show off.

Christopher: Got you, and you do have lots of really good ideas and examples in the book of the difference between, we could just say for simplicity, good and bad lyrics, the really simple stuff versus the stuff that sticks in the listener’s head and really has an emotional impact. In particular you use one of your songs, Dance With A Stranger, as an example of being done right. I wonder if you could tell the story of that song a little bit?

Mark: Yeah, I’d be happy to. That was … I don’t want to bore your folks with every little bit of it, but it plays into some things we talked about. I’d worked my way up career-wise to having access to writing for projects. By that I mean someone would ask you to, which, when I was younger, I used to pretend someone asked me to. It turned into a technique that I still coach that’s like, pretend someone asks you to write a song. Now do all these things, so that when they finally do ask you, you kind of know where to go. So now, I’m having a little bit of success. Tina Turner is at the absolute height of her career. The greatest hits is coming up. I love Tina Turner. Always did. Someone said, “Well, how about writing something for her?” Which doesn’t mean they’re going to do it, it just means you’re in the game. You get a shot. So I did the things I’m talking about, I thought, “I’m ready for this. I know Tina Turner. I’m going to listen to the keys she sings, and the feel she’s in. I’m going to set up a drum loop that is what they’re asking me for. It’s got to be uptempo, kind of.”

Mark: I’m ticking all these boxes, right, and I go through, in the book especially, and in workshops when I talk about this song, because it’s a good learning tool. I did everything I know to do, and are still very good techniques, and get to the end of it, and I think, “This is really good. This sounds like Tina would sing it.” Everybody that hears it goes, “That’s a slam dunk. That is her. That’s a hit single.” So, these are the moments you dream of. I’m in LA, my publisher goes … By now we’re too confident, way too confident. My publisher goes, “I’m just going to go up to her label’s office in LA, in Hollywood, and let’s knock on the door and give them the song and just go, ‘There you go.’” It’s kind of how we felt, which is awful thing to do. Anyway, it worked for a minute.

Mark: So he gives them the song. We go out to lunch, his phone rings, and they go, “Yes, this is brilliant. We love it. We’ve played it for everybody in-house here. We think we’ve got the single for the greatest hits.” Now, what I joked about in the book is it’s not final till it’s final is a good saying that I wasn’t aware till later. But I’m thinking, “What kind of car can I get? This is going to up the game with my house and my kids. She’s at the top of her game, this is going to be the single. This is life-changing for me. This is it.” This is somewhere you should never go as a songwriter or an artist. Anyway, it’s looking great. I thought, “This is it,” and it was a good song, a really, really good song, I thought.

Mark: So, it gets all the way to Tina herself, and Tina says no. We’re devastated. This is probably only a week later, so I’ve gone from a Mercedes showroom to thinking, “Am I going to get kicked out of the house because rent’s due?” Anyway, so, I learned later what it really was was it got to Tina, everybody around her said, “This is the next single for you. This is so you.” She said, “I’ve already done this. I don’t want to be what I was. I want to be something new. I want something that I’m excited about, something fresh.” She had the power of an artist and an artist with vision, a true artist, to go, “No. Done it. You’re not going to shove this down my throat. Not doing it.” So, I’m devastated. There’s a whole nother story later with Tina that is wonderful, but at this point, I’m devastated.

Mark: Little bit later, I get a phone call. I’ll just re-enact it, because it was funny. It’s out of nowhere, and nobody told me it’s coming. I pick up the phone, this guy goes, “Hey, Taylor Dayne’s going to call you in five minutes,” and I went, “Who is …”, and it clicked. And I’m thinking, “Okay. Maybe it’s a hoax? I don’t know how they got my number or what …” Five minutes later, phone rings. She goes, “Cawley,” which already made me a little nuts. Getting called by your last name is not huge to me. So she said, “Cawley, I love your song.” I said, “Cool.” So, same song. Dance with a Stranger. It got to her, I don’t even know how. She said, “I want you to make one change, though.” And at that point, I think back to Diana Ross, so when you hear this coming and go, “Uh-oh. Are we asking for a third of the song and I’m going to change the phrases?” Write a word, get a third, for a lot of artists, because it can be like that, and I thought, “Oh, here we go.”

Mark: It was a minor change. I made the change. She said, “I’m going to call you in five minutes, and have something different.” I said, “Of course I will.” She called five minutes later, I had three or four things. She liked one of them, said, “Okay, I love that,” and hung up. Did the song, the song ended up being on a gold album. I love what she did with it. But so a happy ending to a long journey of getting myself in position to write for the biggest artists, not getting there, picked up by lesser artist but a good one, successful, not taking me back to the Mercedes showroom successful, but, you know, good. It was a big lesson to me, for sure, but the better, if I can share it with you really quickly, the better part of the lesson was years later.

Mark: I’m having more success, I’m older, and I’ve been at it a lot longer. Tina Turner’s still around, and most writers of my ilk were always trying to write for her. I’ve written with Graham Lyle who wrote What’s Love Got To Do With It, the biggest Tina, but I hadn’t had mine, and I wanted a Tina Turner cut. I’m writing with Brenda Russell on a given day, and Kye Fleming, both of them amazing writers. Brenda co-wrote the score for The Color Purple, wrote Get Here, Piano In The Dark, it’s brilliant. The other writer is one of my other best friends, Kye Fleming, who wrote I Was Country When Country Wasn’t Cool, hall of fame country writer. Sleeping Single in A Double Bed, all these huge, iconic country songs.

Mark: Three of us sit down and go, “Okay, we’ve all tried to get to Tina Turner and some of these other artists of the day with varying degrees of success,” but none of us had Tina, and we loved her. We said, “You know what? Screw it,” basically. We said, “Forget it. Forget it, forget it. Let’s not worry about what a publisher says. Let’s just write to knock each other out,” which now is back to garage band for me. Now you’re like a kid again going, “What do you think of this?” You’re trying to impress your friend. But now we’re all, we’ve got a lot more skill, but we’ve let it go. We kind of go, “Let’s just get in the room for two days in Nashville,” which is what we did, “and write something that kills us.” And we did. We wrote one of my favorite songs of all time, Dancing In My Dreams, together, but it’s an odd song. Very odd, it started with a drum loop as I tended to do, but I took a Celtic drum in there, like a tribal-sounding thing. Not pop, not country. I don’t know what it was. Resonated with me, with my Irish background, I think. It kind of went to … I played keyboard on it.

Mark: One did these simple paths, so that was my part of it. Brenda is brilliant at everything, and starts coming up with a gorgeous melody over it. Still no lyric, we don’t know what we’re writing about, but now we don’t care. We’re not writing to a brief, we’re just writing to write. And Kye Fleming is a lyricist, period. This was another lesson for me in life. I had been with Kye enough to know, but Brenda didn’t know, so it was kind of a funny story. Some lyricists and some songwriters, and artists, too, process totally differently than other ones. Some throw out ideas like a hamster on a wheel, and something’ll stick. Others will be quiet all day long, processing really slowly. So, all day goes by, and we’re fired up about what’s going on with the chord changes and the feel and the melody, but there’s no lyric.

Mark: So at the end of the day, I knew both Brenda and Kye, but Brenda and Kye had never met each other till that day. Kye left first, if I remember correctly, and Brenda looked at me and said, “Are you sure about her? Because I haven’t seen anything.” Not so much her skill, of course, she’s brilliant, but Brenda was going, “Does she like what we’re doing? Do you think maybe … Are we off on the wrong foot here?” I said, “Trust me.” Following morning, Kye comes in and goes, “What do you guys think of this?” Finished lyric that was brilliant, absolutely brilliant. Now the fun began, because now we think, “Mission accomplished.” We’ve written a song that all three of us think is the best thing we’ve done, and we’re going away going, as songwriters tend to do, this changes, but on a day like that you go, “We don’t care if anybody ever records it. Don’t care if it makes a dime. This is why we do what we do,” and you go like this, just play, you know, and you play the song endlessly, and you call each other and go, “Are you still listening? I’m still listening.”

Mark: So, Brenda and I literally ran out of the writing room and found the first studio we could go to, a friend of mine in Nashville, Bill McDermott, and recorded a rough version of the song. I played, she sang, Bill played a little guitar. Now we’ve got our demo to hear, but now it’s still like this is a weird song. What’s going to go on with this? We don’t know. And this is the anti-career move. You’re not giving your publisher what they’re looking for, or the label, and the label always has a brief. They really want part B of their hit artists. The artist doesn’t always, but the label does. So, now we’re on the opposite side of my Dance with a Stranger story. The label gets this and is not going, “This is it.” They’re going, “This is not it. Why would you even waste our time sending us this song? Somebody’s losing their mind here, folks.”

Mark: We’re all going, “We don’t care. We love it.” We really didn’t care. But of all people, somebody at one of the publishing houses thinks this is Tina Turner. This is how funny it was. And they, when they did an end around the normal channels and got it to Tina, and long story short, we see Tina on Oprah now, going, “I found the song that’s going to shape my direction. This is my new album. Everything’s based on this song I just found called Dancing In My Dreams by these guys.” We’re going, “Okay?” So, the long story, but the lesson that was incredible for me career-wise was that write what you love, and if you love it enough, a true artist might love it, too. If you copy, like I did with the Taylor Dayne song, true artist is going to go, “Yeah, but I’ve done it. Good song. Been there, done that.” Tina had not been in this direction, and she loved it. It wasn’t a single, but the album sold six million.

Mark: I’ll end this story by saying all three of us said, “Let’s adopt this attitude more often. Let’s write something,” and sure enough, for me, I took that attitude big time. I thought, “I’m only writing what I love and trusting that I’ve learned my craft,” learned all these things I’m talking about in the book and we’re talking about, “and I’m going to let it rip, try to be original.” Right after that, Joe Cocker does one I’ve been trying for him. Chaka Khan does one. All these artists of the day start recording the songs that on the surface don’t sound like them, so incredible lesson, and even tailing into the book in another place, Wynonna Judd years later, who was huge at the time, records a song that was nothing like what they’d been asking for, absolutely nothing like it. And song written from the heart.

Christopher: Tremendous. Know there is so much there to learn for any musician or creative type, and especially obviously for songwriters. I said earlier I have a notebook full of highlights, and I do, and there is so much I still want to pick your brains on. You touched on one big topic there, which is co-writing, but there’s also do you need to know music theory, and you talk about the importance of going to different places, like yourself from New York and London, and Nashville now, and you talk about the importance of knowing different lingo. I’m just going to have to direct everyone to your book, Song Journey, which I can’t recommend highly enough. I thoroughly enjoyed it, and I do want to wrap up though by letting people know what else they can find on your website, idocoach.com.

Mark: Thank you. Yeah, as I mentioned, I coach writers, and that is one-on-one coaching through my website, and it’s all via Skype. I do workshops as well, and behind the book, we’ll be doing a lot more of those this year, but my coaching, there’s no curriculum. It’s kind of what we’ve been talking about. There’s some people I don’t coach. If I talk to them and they go, “My goal is this,” and I think I can’t help you, then I don’t, but most people I can figure a way around making them a better writer, helping them open up some doors. I figure out their goals and their expectations, and then we plot a course together. I don’t have a curriculum. Again, I’m not going to go … This is not music theory. This is not stage one, two, three, four. This is talk to me, let’s see how we’re doing from week to week. Let’s get the best out of you. That’s what I enjoy doing. I’ve been doing that for now seven years, basically, and then workshops on top of it. So, that’s the coaching side.

Mark: And then the book, as you were kind enough to talk about, I know you read, which I appreciate it. The book was a real effort to take the coaching that I’m doing, the life I’ve had before coaching, and to make sort of anecdotal teaching. things not to do, things to think about doing, things to hopefully put you on the right path, things to help you on the business side of it, because most songwriters and most musicians really shy away from the business end of it. So did I, but you do it long enough, you need to learn it, because you’ll get burnt by it, which I did. In the book, couple of huge stories, big deals that I did not pay attention to how it was done other than to go, “Wow, I’ve got a record deal. Thank God. I’m going to be so big it won’t matter what the business end of it is,” but it will bite you, so that’s a big part of my coaching too, from publishing deals all through this.

Mark: But I also, I want to finish that thought by saying I coach teachers, I have a brain surgeon I coach, I have a hospital director in London. People who just want to be creative to be creative. To me, that’s huge fun. I don’t know if it’s more fun, but it’s as fun as someone who goes, “I want to be a hit songwriter.” I like to coach about the creative process, and I love seeing someone do what they’re doing the best they can possibly do it, or have new ideas to do it, and enjoy it. That’s the whole coaching idea, and the book was a reflection of that, for sure.

Christopher: Fantastic. Well, thank you so much, Mark, for joining us on the show today and sharing so generously. I did want to ask you one last thing, which is that we think back to the early stages of your own songwriting journey, if you could wave a magic wand and travel back in time and talk to your younger self, is there any songwriting wisdom you’d want to impart that maybe the listeners and viewers of the show can take on board themselves?

Mark: You know, yes, of course. That’s one of the values of getting older. You hopefully have some wisdom built up. When I look back, I think … I want to make sure I say this correctly. We discussed the idea of jumping sometimes, making big moves in your life. If I could look back at my younger self, a part of me would be proud that I did it, because my older self goes, “You idiot. You had no plan B.” If I were one of my kids, who are now grown, I’d have been hard-pressed to go, “Yeah, of course, do that.” I’d be going, “What? Are you nuts?” So, it’s a funny question, because I could look at my younger self and go, “No, you fool,” but that’s the value to me now, as I get older, I think, “You had to have done that. It’s good that you did.”

Mark: I would say one thing to artists and songwriters, and that is to, it’s an age-old adage, but be nice to the people on the way up and all along this path, because you will meet them again. It’s a very small music community even though it looks like a big world. Some of the people that I still deal with, I’ve known for 30 years, and some of them even, I’ll give you one very quick example, one of my publishers, when I was having a really downtime in my career, very down, wondering what I was going to do next, somebody came back to me, a guy named Torquil Creevy, who now, he was like the lowest guy on the ladder of a record deal I had. What they usually call tea boys, I think, and he’s just bringing the tea. Nice guy.

Mark: I didn’t really remember him that well, and now he’s running the publishing portion of Miles Copeland’s publishing empire. Miles is doing Sting and the Police and everybody, and he calls me and goes, “I always loved your writing and liked you, and I always remember you were really kind to me. What are you doing now?” I mean, that was such a lesson. He threw me a lifeline, really, and looking back, I think, “Had I’d been a jerk to him,” as artists and writers can be on the way up, “I’d never got that call,” and things would have maybe had a different trajection totally. So, yeah, be aware of everybody around you, and be kind and be nice, because you do this long enough, they’re all going to come around.

Christopher: Tremendous. What better note to end on. Just a big thank you again, Mike. You’ve given so generously of your time and your wisdom today, and I strongly recommend everyone head to idocoach.com and check out your book, Song Journey. Thank you again, Mark.

Mark: Thank you.

Enjoying the show? Please consider rating and reviewing it!

The post How to Earn Your Inspiration, with Mark Cawley appeared first on Musical U.

Rewind: Singing

New musicality video:

Do you want to become a more confident and capable singer? The Musical U team rewinds to past guest experts as we explore singing. Today on Musicality Now. http://musicalitypodcast.com/180

Links and Resources

What Your Voice Can Do, with Jeremy Fisher – https://www.musical-u.com/learn/what-your-voice-can-do-with-jeremy-fisher/

All Things Vocal, with Judy Rodman – https://www.musical-u.com/learn/things-vocal-judy-rodman/

Christian D. Larson – “Promise Yourself” – https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/189796-promise-yourself-to-be-so-strong-that-nothing-can-disturb

Rewind: Practicing – https://www.musical-u.com/learn/rewind-practicing/

The Story of the “Fifth Beatle”, with Kenneth Womack – https://www.musical-u.com/learn/story-fifth-beatle-kenneth-womack/

Find and Make Peace with Your Voice, with Nikki Loney – https://www.musical-u.com/learn/find-and-make-peace-with-your-voice-with-nikki-loney/

Singing that Sounds Good – and Beyond, with Davin Youngs – https://www.musical-u.com/learn/singing-that-sounds-good-and-beyond-with-davin-youngs/

If you enjoy the show please rate and review it! http://musicalitypodcast.com/review

Join Musical U with the Special offer for podcast listeners http://musicalitypodcast.com/join

Let us know what you think! Email: hello@musicalitypodcast.com

===============================================

Learn more about Musical U!

Website:
https://www.musical-u.com/

Podcast:
http://musicalitypodcast.com 

Tone Deaf Test:
http://tonedeaftest.com/

Musicality Checklist:
https://www.musical-u.com/mcl-musicality-checklist 

Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/MusicalU 

YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/c/MusicalU

Subscribe for more videos from Musical U!

Rewind: Singing

Rewind: Singing

Do you want to become a more confident and capable singer? The Musical U team rewinds to past guest experts as we explore singing. Today on Musicality Now.

Watch the episode:

Enjoying the show? Please consider rating and reviewing it!

Links and Resources

Enjoying The Musicality Podcast? Please support the show by rating and reviewing it!

Rate and Review!

Transcript

Adam: Welcome back to another episode of Musicality Now. I’m Adam Liette, Operations Manager for Musical U.

Adam: A couple of months ago, we recorded our first rewind episode of the podcast and we were thrilled to hear from so many of you who loved the episode, who loved the different things that we brought in, and hearing from our wonderful guests again. I asked the team to come back to this time explore singing. One of our favorite topics here at Musical U.

Adam: Now one thing that we hear from so many musicians is how much they either love or can’t stand to hear their own singing voice. It seems to be an either/or for many musicians, and yet the singing voice is the most basic instrument that any of you have, and it’s the one instrument that we all are indeed born with. Yes, I said instrument, because singers are instrumentalists as well, they just use their singing voice.

Adam: I can remember back to my days at university when I was studying classical trumpet, my professor instructed us to always start out by singing the exercises that we were getting ready to play. This was not only in prepared études or solos that we were playing, but also routine things like exercises and even long tones. By singing, we internalized the sound of the pitch through our voice and just used the instrument to project what was already in our head. Easier said than done, right?

Adam: Now, whether you love to sing or can’t stand your singing voice, this episode is full of great tips from several experts that we’ve had on the show thus far. We hope it gives you the confidence and desire to find your own singing voice and express your musicality through song.

Adam: Now, before we go on to all of our wonderful guests we’re bringing back, I’d like to first introduce the Musical U team. First we have Andrew Bishko. Say hello, Andrew.

Andrew: Hello Adam. I’m Andrew. I’m the Product Manager at Musical U.

Adam: I’m also joined by Anastasia.

Anastasia: Hi everyone.

Adam: And finally, Zac.

Zac: Hey Adam, great to be here. I’m Zac, Community Assistant at Musical U.

Adam: Now, before we get into some of the specifics and some of the techniques that many vocalists use, I’d like to start off with a clip from Nikki Loney. Now, Nikki Loney was just on the podcast a couple of months ago, and she had these incredible, profound moments that I’d like to begin by sharing with you.

Nikki Loney: Like I truly believe, on my business cards it says, “Yes, everyone can sing.” I truly believe that and I get very, very, no pun intended, vocal with people who put down other people. I’ve got a dad who constantly tells me how much his wife can’t sing. I’m like, “Do not say those things. Don’t say that.” I don’t believe that.

Nikki Loney: I also would like to just mention, the pop culture of the whole Canadian Idol, American Idol, America’s Got Talent. Our good friend Simon Cowell and his really … That whole thing where people would go and sing poorly and he would make fun of them, unfortunately has created this environment where people think that it’s okay to do that. It’s not. It is not okay to say those horrible things to people.

Nikki Loney: Art is subjective. There are singers who I love the sound of their voices and there are singers who I don’t. It doesn’t mean that they’re bad singers. It’s just that those sound qualities or their emotion, I don’t connect with it. But it’s not … I have no right to pick on anyone’s voice.

Nikki Loney: When my students bring in songs that they want to sing and maybe I’m not a fan of the vocalist … I’m saying this to teachers out there. We do not have any right to criticize the singers that our students connect to. We have no right. I am not going to go into a lecture about how it’s horrible singing and it’s this and it’s that. The music and the sounds that bring students to us is so personal and we need to stay out of it.

Adam: Now, part of the reason I love this clip is a couple of months ago I was talking with David. David’s one of our students inside the course Foundations of a Musical Mind. David had always been told that he couldn’t sing and that he should never try to sing, especially not in public. So he didn’t. As a consequence, he never tried to sing in his entire life. Until he found Musical U and was encouraged to explore his voice once again.

Adam: Now, during our call he talked about when he first realized that he could sing. The look of joy on his face when he recalled that moment. It’s one of my favorite times in my years here at Musical U. It meant so much to him to come to this revelation. To be able to share that moment with another musician, I think that’s why we all get into this art to begin with, because music is personal. It’s not always easy.

Adam: Those that walk around criticizing everyone else are largely so insecure with their own abilities that they feel compelled to tear everyone else down. It’s how they make themselves feel better and gain confidence. One of the things that I love about the community here at Musical U is that it’s exact opposite. Everyone is just full of encouragement and suggestions, helpful suggestions, for other members to continue to grow.

Adam: It really reminds me of two lines from my favorite poem. It’s called Promise Yourself by Christian D. Larson. Now, I don’t want to read the whole poem, and we’ll link to it in the show notes, because I think it’s very powerful. The first line is: Promise yourself to be just as enthusiastic about the success of others as you are about yourself. And, to give so much time to the improvement of yourself that you have no time to criticize others.

Adam: I first heard about this poem from my trumpet instructor when I was at university. What he had us do, everyone in the studio put this poem on the front of our practice journals. It was a constant reminder to walk into every practice session, every interaction with other musicians with this mindset. That we are there to help each other, to help each other grow and to also remind ourselves that these kind of negative thoughts, they don’t lead to growth.

Adam: So Nikki’s … The way she phrased this was just incredible, and I wanted to share it with you because not only is this something that you shouldn’t do, you actually don’t have the right to do it.

Adam: Now I know some other members of the team are eager to talk about this clip, so I’d like to open up the floor.

Adam: Andrew, why don’t you get us started?

Andrew: I’m really glad you played that one. When I grew up, I had these nodes on my vocal chords. If I tried to sing, if I opened up my mouth, I would lose my voice, I mean … So I gave up pretty early. It was a … When I get to a point where in my training, I was in ear training program at New England Conservatory, and I had to sing. Just discovering that I could do it was a huge, a huge deal for me, and your story that you told about David was so moving because I remember that moment for myself when I was like, I could do this and I enjoy it. I like it. Not to mention all the uses that singing has, but just the very fact that I could actually do it was a huge move for me.

Zac: Yes, Adam, I’m so glad as well that you chose that clip. Before I saw you picked that clip I was actually thinking about picking it myself because I think it’s really important. I’ve watched those shows like American Idol and those kinds of things. I always thought it’s kind of funny, it’s kind of entertaining, but I never thought that those negative things really do, they have a ripple effect, and they carry on through people’s lives. One person’s negative, it ripples out and they spread it.

Zac: I think it’s really important, in all aspects of your life, especially singing, because singing takes a lot of confidence and you have to come from within you. It’s really hard to let that internal light shine outward. We all have to help each other rise up. We have to lift each other up. We can’t hold each other back with negativity. When we put positivity out and we help other people become successful and feel more confident, then we feel more confident and we become more successful, and then that ripples out. I think it’s super important and super powerful to make sure you’re mindful of the negative things you say and don’t say those things. Just be positive. It’s hard and it takes practice just like anything else to be positive, but you can do it so I’m really glad you chose that.

Anastasia: Me too. That was a really, really great clip to lead off with, and everything that was said about maintaining a positive attitude about other people’s voices and about your own is so important. I think another takeaway from that clip which is maybe more indirect is the fact that what you may not like in another person’s voice might sound like absolute gold to someone else. Everyone has a unique voice with cool quirks and idiosyncrasies that make their voice special. I think listening to each individual’s voice is actually a really special experience for me because it’s authentic. It’s theirs, it’s one of a kind with whatever unique qualities it possesses, whether it’s raspy or high or more full or more thin or whatever. Your voice is unique to you and it’s special and you have a right to sing, which I think is an important point that a lot of our podcast guests have made.

Anastasia: I was really excited to do a podcast rewind volume two episode on the topic of singing to hear this kind of thing about how everyone has the right to sing, you should look positively at your own singing voice and encourage others to be the same … to do the same. Sorry. An episode that furthers this idea and really stood out to me when I first heard it was called Singing That Sounds Good and Beyond with Davin Youngs, I believe it’s episode number 36 of the Musicality Podcast. The whole thing’s brilliant. He’s got so many good insights, but a big a-ha moment for me came about 10 minutes into the episode. Let’s take a listen to the clip now.

Davin Youngs: Yeah. I mean, the bottom line is, is that a lot of teachers teach singing in terms of sound, and they teach singing in terms of what they think sounds good and that … honestly, a lot of systems have supported that, and a lot of people don’t even know that they’re doing it, but the problem with what sounds good is it’s not always what’s functionally most free for the singer, and so that really … that seems basic. When you say to most people, when people go into my private studio space and I say to them, “You know, I’m really listening for what’s going on in your throat when you make sound.” People kind of look at me like, “Duh.”

Davin Youngs: But what I’m saying is, is that not everyone does that, and they don’t always know that they don’t do it. When we make sounds there is actual physical manifestation of a sound. There’s something happening in your throat, and when we can learn to hear the function of it we can respond to the sound with exercises that would encourage the singer to sing with more physical freedom, and physical freedom always translates into a more beautiful sound, always.

Anastasia: I love that clip for a lot of different reasons. To give a bit of context, he uses the term ‘functional freedom’ in there, and it’s a term that crops up a handful of times throughout the episode. To give a bit of an explanation, functional freedom is essentially referring to a state of singing where your throat is not constricted or tightened or tense and you’re not in any pain, but rather your singing is relaxed and you’re working in such a way that feels natural and painless, and the best part of it is that it sounds good. It’s the … Functional freedom is basically the physical comfort and ease and joy, really, that you should feel when you’re singing.

Anastasia: A bit of background context about me which might explain why I like this clip so much, I’m a singer songwriter who can sing, reasonably well, I think, and in tune, although listening back to recordings of my own singing voice, sometimes is still a little bit weird for me. However, when I was first starting to sing, I noticed some discomfort and even sometimes exhaustion after periods of singing. First I thought the issue was with my lung capacity, maybe I’m not breathing properly, was I taking in too little air or too much, what’s going on? Back then I think I thought pain was an indicator of a good practice session. That the sound coming out of my mouth was the only thing that mattered. I gave very, very little thought to the mechanics behind the sound and whether it felt good to make that sound in the first place. I didn’t know that in fact physical discomfort often translates to a worse sound.

Anastasia: There’s a certain feeling that you might be familiar with when you’re singing, it’s one of tension. It can feel like a lump in the back of your throat. Sometimes it’s even painful. This is what’s referred to as dysfunction, because singing is really not supposed to hurt. Again, pain is your body signaling that something is wrong. The great thing that Davin highlights in his clip is that you can troubleshoot this. You can troubleshoot dysfunction in your singing voice in the same way that you could with instrument technique, for example, why do my wrists hurt when I’m practicing the piano in this way? Okay, maybe I’m holding my elbows at the wrong angle, maybe something’s going on with my wrist that’s wonky. In the same way you can troubleshoot issues that you’re having when you’re singing and you can get yourself closer and closer to this functional freedom, this comfort that you should feel when you’re singing. Along the way you’ll notice that you’re going to start sounding better too, so really it’s a win/win.

Anastasia: Another thing I love about that clip is that Davin highlights the beauty of a functionally free voice and how the more physical freedom you have, the nicer the sound. This nicely ties into Adam’s clip and what Nikki was talking about in her episode that your voice has natural beauty, it has its own timbre, it has its own special quirks and really what you can do to make it sound better is just get closer and closer to functional freedom and comfort.

Anastasia: We all kind of know the feeling I’m describing. I’m sure a lot of singers have felt it. Maybe you slide into a certain register or you hold a note and it just feels smooth as butter in your throat. It’s sounding good, it feels natural and physically we’re totally at ease and that’s functional freedom and that is what we should all be aspiring to do when we sing, and we’re going to sound good, always.

Adam: I remember being at my age and when I was growing up in music, listening to Metallica and Nirvana and trying to sing like those guys because they’re incredible singers, and I was always trying to mimic my style after them and oh man, I lost my voice so many times trying to sing that way. It was not this good way of singing. But it’s this attitude that in order to sing that way you have to constrict your throat and do all these weird things that you think that these vocalists are doing, but the funny thing is, when you learn to sing the proper way, you can later mimic those sounds, it’s just they’re doing it in a way that’s freer and able to really express themselves. Properly learning how to sing is so important when you’re trying to mimic some of the people you’re hearing on the radio.

Zac: Well, that was really great to hear for me because I’m still very much a beginner with singing, and I have definitely experienced that lump thing you’re talking about. I’m very wary with my voice, so any time I feel any kind of pain or weirdness I stop, which prevents me from practicing that much. So I practice in short bursts, 10, 15 minutes at a time. It’s because I’m scared to hurt my voice, because yeah, I’m always just trying to be really relaxed and find that freedom. But it’s really good to hear that because now I have a clearer aim. Okay, yes, I need to look for that freedom. Yeah, that’s given me some hope, because sometimes it just … Yeah, it’s like … It’s good to know that I shouldn’t be working through that pain and hurting my voice. I feel like I’m doing something right, but hopefully I can get a little bit more free and practice a little more.

Zac: For my clip I picked episode 44 with Judy Rodman from All Things Vocal. JudyRodman.com. She is super inspiring. The first time I heard that episode, I listened to it, after I listened to it I was like, “That is the coolest person I’ve ever heard of. I want to be her friend.” There’s a lot of great stuff in there. But this clip in particular talks about her experience with being a jingle singer, which is pretty fascinating. So go ahead and listen to that.

Judy Rodman: Right. I think I was about 20 when I got the staff job, the staff jingle singing job and at that time this was the 70s, and almost every product you can imagine had a jingle that went with it back in those days. It’s not that way anymore. Also all the radio stations, of course, needed jingle packages and needed radio IDs. … You know, that kind of thing. I had to learn to sing, you know, there was … in the 70’s there was no pitch fixing unless we did it ourselves and so, you know, there was … Editing involved blood because people, you know, they used razor blades to splice the tape together if they wanted to edit something. We tried to require as little blood out of our engineers as possible. We had to learn to cut offs precisely, to shape vowels like the group leader said, determined to do it and make that a quick decision, to pronounce things exactly the same, to sustain notes exactly the same, to fall off, to swell, to …

Judy Rodman: All of this was reading music because of course we can’t memorize that much stuff from 8:30 in the morning to 3:30 and each day it was new stuff. I had to learn to be a ninja reader of vocal manuscript and all that.

Judy Rodman: It was just an amazing … In fact, I’ll tell you the first thing I learned from my group. My first group leader that was in the jingles singing was that if I was just the tiniest bit under zero degrees as far as the pitch went, just a tiny bit low, he said, “Do the inner smile on it. Do an inner smile on it,” and it lifted it right in the middle of zero. So that’s the first thing I learned from jingle singing, was how to fix a slightly flat pitch.

Zac: Yeah, so there is a lot of stuff in that clip. First of all, anything that deals with the recording and engineering and mixing before computer digital workstations is totally fascinating to me, because they had to do some real hard work. Just the whole thing, she worked from 8:30AM to 3:30PM every day, had to sight read new songs every day, and had to hit every single note exactly perfect every time, pretty much. That is crazy incredible. She said ninja. She had to reach a ninja level, and that is not an understatement. Because I’m a beginner singer, I’ve tried some sight singing, I’m working on that. It’s crazy hard.

Zac: To be on that level to where you could just execute it with machine precision is crazy. Because now we have all kinds of plugins. We can fix things so easy. You can use audio envelopes to change the length of notes. There’s just so many things you can do. There’s all kinds of pitch correction software. I just recently saw this pitch correction plugin that actually fixes your pitch while you sing. You don’t even have to record it and fix it later. It adjusts it. It has a tuner on it and it adjusts it right as you’re singing. That’s … Judy had to put in the work to be really, really good.

Zac: I also love those old radio jingles. I think that’s so cool, because another thing they had to do was emulate the style of popular music, so she had to be able to sing in every single kind of style, had to do it with precision, and that is mind blowing, fascinating to me. Yeah, I was like, wow.

Zac: Then that little tip at the end where she talks about the inner smile. I use that all the time. That works so well. Any time you’re a little bit flat, just give it a little lift. Just brighten it up a little bit and it’s usually right there. That … Judy has … Man, she’s crazy cool. That stuff is crazy.

Zac: I’m glad I don’t have to get blood on my fingers. I like to do recording and engineering and stuff too. I’m glad I don’t have to use razor blades. I can just use a mouse. Kind of take that for granted and then you hear about these old stories where hey, they work all day to … Those songs are like 20 seconds. But I’m sure it took them a crazy amount of time and work to be that good at doing them.

Adam: I think this is fitting, we just had Beatles Month last month, and we talked to Kenneth Womack who talked about how The Beatles had to record all their songs and the amount of overdubs and editing they had to do to make those incredible records, because they didn’t even have 16 track recording. Early Beatles were on four tracks and then later they upgraded to eight tracks, and wow, what a revelation that was to have eight full tracks to record music. Even Bohemian Rhapsody, the recording of that. The amount of overdubs that went into that process.

Adam: I also think, when you look at standard music that we hear today, there are all those vocal fixes in there. If you’re hearing your favorite artist and thinking, “How do they sing like that?” There are a lot of very famous, very accomplished artists out there that cannot sing in tune all the time. They rely on those different plugins and those different tools to make their records sound good.

Adam: I think another takeaway from that is don’t be so hard on yourself if you find yourself a little bit out of pitch. Because a lot of these people that you look up to and are learning from, there’s a lot of stuff being fixed in the mix and in the recording studio.

Zac: Yeah, I was going to add on to what you’re saying about the pop singers and stuff, that is no joke. It’s easy for them to record something 50 times and then splice together the best little chunks. Each word of a verse might be from a different recording take. It might be adjusted pitch. Sometimes when you’re mixing someone’s vocals, it’s a tedious task to go fix all of the pitch mistake and the timing mistakes, and you can just do it quick and then it’s pop, sounds great.

Andrew: Now we’re getting all down on the pop stars now, we shouldn’t do that. Nikki Loney said don’t do that. All right. They’re singing and they’re being recorded and they’re sounding good and I’m not, so … But I’m singing and having fun. I had the … Matching pitch has always been a challenge for me. I was really encouraged listening to episode number 76, Christopher and Jeremy were talking, Jeremy Fisher. They were talking about how the voice is … It’s never right there. It’s always moving a little bit this way or that way and the nature of the voice. We talk about the voice being an instrument, but it’s also a unique instrument. It had a unique quality to it. I think this is a good time to check out that clip.

Jeremy Fisher: You slide or you jump, but you still have to speed everything up. The voice really is a sliding instrument. That is what it is designed to do, it’s designed to slide around. When we want distinct pitches, we just stop a sound or we slide really fast, so you the listener don’t really hear the slide in between, unless you want to feature the slide, which a lot of music styles do.

Jeremy Fisher: You are looking at sliding around and the best instrument for that is the trombone. I work with people to sing while they are miming playing the trombone, so the lower notes are further away from you, and then you bring the slide up as you go higher, so the higher notes get closer to you, and that works really well for a lot of people, because again, it’s physicalizing what pitch is outside of what you are doing.

Andrew: Okay, so it’s interesting, be he talked about other instruments also, like the piano, how the high notes are on the right, the low notes are on the left. Or if I’m playing my saxophone, I have all my fingers down and that’s the low notes, and I lift them up they get higher. If I’m playing the cello, the higher up my finger is, the lower the note and then as I go down like this with my finger, the notes get higher. Each instrument has its own way of physically modeling pitch. With the trombone it’s really easy, I can go … Slide and it is so close to the voice and it was so reassuring. It’s like, okay, it’s not just me when I can’t go … That’s the way the voice is.

Andrew: That also gives me tips in how I can be more accurate. I actually used this exercise. It was inspiring for the new revision we did of the match pitch module inside Musical U and in Foundations of a Musical Mind where we have these match pitch exercises where you’re sliding into the note, you’re sliding down into the note. It just … You learn so much about your voice by sliding up to the pitch or sliding down to the pitch that you’re looking for. So much of it is you’re trying to calibrate and find where this is.

Andrew: The other thing about the voice is not only is it sliding, but the different places in your range, it just feels different. If you’re reaching for something and you’re pushing for it, it’s a lot more flexible with the comfortable part of your range, and a lot less flexible in the less … in the higher part of the range where … There’s all kinds of continuum things happening with the voice where there’s all this change and sliding. To find your place in there and then find that place to express yourself within that continuum is just a wonderful picture for me that really helps.

Andrew: When I was at the New England Conservatory I took this class with this guy, his name was Joseph Gabriel Esther Maneri, he taught microtones. We were learning to sing six pitches inside a half step. It was so cool to hear that continuum. What was amazing is that when you did this for a while and you did this kind of singing, even though it was like we were all just totally guessing. But even trying to do it, all of a sudden the whole world starts singing to you. You start to hear the pitch in everything. The car driving by, the door slam. A drum doesn’t sound un-pitched anymore, you hear all the pitches. You start to hear all those frequencies. They come alive when we started to work on that.

Andrew: That was also … That was about the time when I was starting to sing because I had to, no. When I was starting to sing and starting to enjoy it. That was very helpful to have that sense of the continuum of the pitches rather than seeing the voices like a piano, you press the key and then the next key is the next note, there’s nothing in between. There’s all kinds of stuff in between, all kinds of good stuff. I really enjoyed that clip. It was really meaningful for me. It’s been very helpful in my teaching, both inside and outside Musical U. I’m really grateful for Jeremy Fisher for bringing the trombone into the classroom here.

Adam: I love that that’s the exact opposite from how I learned was sing first and then put it on the instruments. All this stuff that the instrument’s doing goes to your voice too and I’m thinking, “Well, it doesn’t really work for trumpet,” and then it does, because your embouchure goes … and you start to … you lift up your embouchure when you’re going to higher pitches, and oh, this does really work for every instrument, doesn’t it.

Andrew: You know, one thing that happened recently, my boys were playing with this piece of Pex pipe, this long piece of plumbing pipe that I had. I don’t know how this fits in, but it was so cool because he started singing into this pipe. Just naturally because the back, the way the pipe reacted, he would be hitting harmonics. So his voice would jump to these different harmonics like a trumpet. I was like, “How is that …?” And I tried it myself. It would jump to harmonics like a trumpet. I was like … It was really interesting how just by putting a pipe over my mouth, that it would do that.

Anastasia: Andrew, I loved what you had to say about a continuum of pitches rather than just … Obviously we’re taught that in Western music there are 12 pitches per octave, but that’s not the full truth, as we know. It’s actually there are millions and millions and millions of pitches, which you can either view as scary or as kind of cool because you can actually say that you’re always going to be at least a tiny little bit out of tune. What happens is with more and more practice of singing, it’s … The calibration that Andrew just talked about, you get a better and better idea as you sing more and more of what the correct pitches are.

Anastasia: In fact even myself, I correct as I sing. A lot of the time I will land on the wrong note and I just pitch up, pitch down, adjust. It’s a constant game of adjusting. This doesn’t mean that you’re a bad singer. This doesn’t mean that you can’t match pitch. In fact, if you land on the wrong note and you can pitch up or pitch down to get to a place that sounds more correct, that’s a testament to your talent as a singer and to the fact that you can listen to yourself and correct accordingly. There’s no such thing as really the right note. We talk about this a lot also in the context of improvisation that if you land on a wrong note, you can very easily bend it up or bend it down. Guess what, that’s a cool singing embellishment. That’s a really nice little sound to throw in. All this to say, I don’t think it’s a great idea to get so focused on getting the pitches correctly that you forget to have fun with it. Even something a little bit out of tune can still sound great first of all, and second of all can be easily corrected, and you get better at this the more you practice it.

Zac: Yes, yes. I loved that episode with Jeremy Fisher as well. There was a lot of … I don’t know, standard idea-breaking things in there. He was breaking down some common ideas that I had myself. One of those things, I actually … One of the first vocal things I got was don’t slide into a note. It was like, if you don’t hit that note right, then you did it wrong. You can’t slide around and fix it. You have to go back and get it right. For me incorporating … When I head that episode with Jeremy Fisher I started incorporating the sliding and it’s so much better. If you’re trying to jump between … I don’t know, if you’re trying to go a fifth or you’re trying to go an octave, it’s so much easier to slide between them a few times or how … or just have fun with it and then you can start to jump between them a little bit more.

Zac: Also, there’s this idea of static stretching versus dynamic stretching. Static stretching would be where you hold a position. Dynamic stretching is where you move in and out of it. When you move in and out of something, say like a note, instead of just going to your highest note and holding it for as long as you can, you kind of go in and out of it with a nice slide. That gives you control over your whole range more. It also allows you to increase your range with more relaxation, which I think ties in to Anastasia’s clip about that freedom that you’re trying to achieve. By using the slide, you get more control over your range and you get more relaxed, and you have more freedom with your voice. And you get to know your voice more. That sliding is super powerful.

Andrew: Absolutely. You know, it was something I wanted to bring up, and it wasn’t really totally touched on in these episodes, but if you’re … For the people who are still listening who are saying, “What if I … You’re assuming that I want to sing.” Some of you out there don’t want to sing. I get that because I know, it was also painful for me, still is at certain places. Singing … You don’t have to sing for anybody, but it’s a powerful tool. I know that Adam brought that up in terms of practicing the trumpet. I’m bringing that up in terms of my musicality, in terms of I do a lot of transcribing, I do a lot of learning by ear when I’m picking out songs for a band, and I’ve been doing it for years for the different bands I’ve had because there’s just no written music for it, or if I want to change something or do an arrangement.

Andrew: Being able to sing and get halfway close to a pitch is such a valuable tool for your musicianship, no matter what you’re doing. If you’re playing an instrument, if you want to play by ear, the voice is what gets you from this to that. The voice gets you from what’s here to what’s here in your fingers or whatever. The voice gets you from one place to another. So if you’ve actually been one of those people who don’t want to sing but suffered through this episode anyway, all these tips are really good for you and it’s great to sing and if you’re a Musical U member, we’ll help you out. We’ll get you singing.

Zac: Yeah. I just wanted to second that emotion real quick. I can definitely attest to the fact that once I started singing and practicing singing more, which I was afraid of, my ear has definitely increased. I can transcribe melodies easier, rhythms too. It’s pretty incredible. I just wanted to say, yeah, sing because it’s awesome and it makes all of your other musical stuff pick up. I’m a DJ. I scratch. But singing just activates your ear and you listen more. When I scratch I can hear my scratches more and my scratches are more melodic. My scratches are more musical because of practicing singing.

Anastasia: Totally, totally agreed with all of that. Singing has so many musical benefits that you don’t realize until one day you’re like, “Oh, hang on. Actually singing enabled me to hear this and do this, and hear … pick out this melody in this song.” Et cetera. For me singing is an absolutely indispensable part of my musical toolkit because I like to write my own music, and it is the fastest and easiest, and most accurate way to get from what I have inside my head as a song idea to putting it out onto a piano or a guitar or a digital audio workstation where I sometimes write music.

Anastasia: Just as a final thought from me, if you ever think you’re going to segue into writing your own music, singing is so, so valuable for it and so indispensable for that.

Adam: Thank you all so much, I feel like we’ve just really scratched the surface here. There’s so much to talk about on this subject, it’s like pick and choose where we want to go with this episode because I feel like we’re only talking about so many of the great number of things we can talk about. We’ve had so many incredible guests that have talked about singing on the podcast. In an effort not to leave anyone out, please check out the rest of the episodes. Subscribe to us on iTunes or check out MusicalityPodcast.com.

Adam: But one thing I really want to just touch on to end things is that we’ve been talking a lot about Kodály these last couple of months in our course Foundations of a Musical Mind. One of the things that I hear from members and indeed studying Kodály himself is that we need to sometimes approach learning music through the eyes of a child. Get back to that child-like joy that we had when we first started learning. Because that is incredible and powerful, and so inquisitive. You can do so many things because you’re so free of judgment. You’re willing to experiment. I know one of my favorite things in life has been seeing my children run around singing songs that they’re hearing or expressing themselves musically. I think there’s so much to gain from that.

Adam: Now, whether or not you’re ready to start singing or not I’m public or by yourself, just know that you’re … there’s so much to gain by expressing yourself through your singing voice. I hope this episode really encourages you to start. Give it a try. Even if it’s in the corner, in the closet by yourself, or as the popular adage goes here in America, singing in the shower. There’s so much to gain.

Adam: Thank you so much for joining us. Thank you for the Musical U team for joining me to talk about this wonderful topic. I can’t wait to see you next time on Musicality Now.

Enjoying the show? Please consider rating and reviewing it!

The post Rewind: Singing appeared first on Musical U.

Playing With Heart and By Heart, with Sarah Jeffery

New musicality video:

Have you ever thought that the recorder was an instrument just for children’s music education? Sarah Jeffery from Team Recorder, the top YouTube channel for recorder players, joins us to show you just how fascinating and versatile an instrument it can be.
http://musicalitypodcast.com/179

Sarah creates wonderful tutorial videos there and although her target viewer is the adult recorder player, so much of what she teaches is rich in musicality and relevant across instruments that we were really eager to invite her onto the show.

Sarah studied recorder at a university level for 9 years, in the United Kingdom and in Amsterdam, among the world’s top players and teachers, and she started Team Recorder with the mission of making that wealth of knowledge she’d had the privilege to learn be accessible to anyone in the world who wants to know more about recorder.

In this conversation we talk about:

– The big difference it makes to play music by heart rather than from sheet music – and how to make that memorisation process easier.

– How it’s possible to sing and play recorder at the same time – and why you might want to do that…

– And as well as her YouTube work, Sarah is a professional performer and recording artist, and we discuss her recent recorder-centered album, Constellations, and how contemporary recorder music can be more accessible as a listener than you might expect.

We hope that after today’s episode you’re going to be going out and telling all your musician friends about these cool ideas you picked up from a professional recorder player… or that you might even be tempted to pick up a recorder yourself!

This is Musicality Now, from Musical U.

Listen to the episode: http://musicalitypodcast.com/179

Links and Resources

Sarah Jeffery Website : http://www.sarahjeffery.com/

Team Recorder YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtrtCvRBjJgqZaD17FDg64Q

Sarah Jeffery – “Constellations” : https://team-recorder.myshopify.com/

Tone Deaf Test : http://tonedeaftest.com/

If you enjoy the show please rate and review it! http://musicalitypodcast.com/review

Join Musical U with the Special offer for podcast listeners http://musicalitypodcast.com/join

Let us know what you think! Email: hello@musicalitypodcast.com

===============================================

Learn more about Musical U!

Website:
https://www.musical-u.com/

Podcast:
http://musicalitypodcast.com 

Tone Deaf Test:
http://tonedeaftest.com/

Musicality Checklist:
https://www.musical-u.com/mcl-musicality-checklist 

Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/MusicalU 

YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/c/MusicalU

Subscribe for more videos from Musical U!

Playing With Heart and By Heart, with Sarah Jeffery

Playing With Heart and By Heart, with Sarah Jeffery

Today on the show we’re joined by Sarah Jeffery, host of “Team Recorder”, the top YouTube channel for recorder players, with over 40,000 subscribers.

Sarah creates wonderful tutorial videos there and although her target viewer is the adult recorder player, so much of what she teaches is rich in musicality and relevant across instruments that we were really eager to invite her onto the show.

Sarah studied recorder at a university level for 9 years, in the United Kingdom and in Amsterdam, among the world’s top players and teachers, and she started Team Recorder with the mission of making that wealth of knowledge she’d had the privilege to learn be accessible to anyone in the world who wants to know more about recorder.

If you have had this idea that the recorder is quite a simple instrument used mostly in children’s music education, then Sarah’s channel will blow your mind, and this conversation is going to show you just how fascinating and versatile an instrument it can be.

In this conversation we talk about:

  • The big difference it makes to play music by heart rather than from sheet music – and how to make that memorisation process easier.
  • How it’s possible to sing and play recorder at the same time – and why you might want to do that…
  • And as well as her YouTube work, Sarah is a professional performer and recording artist, and we discuss her recent recorder-centered album, Constellations, and how contemporary recorder music can be more accessible as a listener than you might expect.

We hope that after today’s episode you’re going to be going out and telling all your musician friends about these cool ideas you picked up from a professional recorder player… or that you might even be tempted to pick up a recorder yourself!

This is Musicality Now, from Musical U.

Photo credit: Claudia Hansen

Watch the episode:

Enjoying the show? Please consider rating and reviewing it!

Links and Resources

Enjoying The Musicality Podcast? Please support the show by rating and reviewing it!

Rate and Review!

Transcript

Sarah: Hello, everybody. I’m Sarah Jeffery and I’m a recorder player, and this is Musicality Now.

Christopher: Welcome to the show, Sarah. Thank you for joining us today.

Sarah: Thank you for having me.

Christopher: So I was saying to you just before we started recording that I’ve become a really big fan of the Team Recorder YouTube channel, and that was a bit surprising to me because I’m not a recorder player, or at least not since I was a very small child. And it’s because you have such an interesting perspective on learning music, becoming a musician, developing your musicality. And even though all of that is framed in terms of being a recorder player, almost everything you say in a lot of your videos is applicable to any instrument and any musician.

So I was really keen to invite you onto the show and share some of your perspective on topics like playing by ear, learning music by heart, and also to unpack a little bit what it means to be a recorder player in the 21st century, because I think a lot of people pigeonhole recorder into a little box. And, certainly for me, coming from the UK, it’s very closely associated with early music education and children playing recorder. But, of course, it is a fully-fledged family of instruments in its own right, and you have a very interestingly broad experience as a performer yourself in terms of what the recorder can do.

Sarah: Yes.

Christopher: And clearly, my head is packed with things I want to talk to you about. I wonder if we might start at the beginning with your own backstory and how you got started in music, and where the recorder entered the picture for you?

Sarah: Yeah, sure. So I feel like I accidentally became a recorder player. It was never my plan from when I was small or something. So to go back to the beginning, my mom plays a lot of different instruments as a hobby. She plays piano and guitar and a bit of everything, and some recorder. So when I was six, she started a recorder club at my primary school, which I joined. And, of course, I hated having my mom teaching me the recorder, so I told her to go away and I would just play by myself for fun.

And in the meantime, I started piano lessons and flute lessons, and that was my music education throughout my childhood. So I went for my weekly piano and flute lessons, and the recorder was something I played on my own in my spare time. I did go to a recorder club on Saturday mornings, which was really nice, but we were just a group of kids playing together with a conductor. There were no formal lessons or anything.

And skip forward some years, when I was about 17, I suddenly had this idea that I wanted to go and be a musician and go to university and study music, and I wanted to do the recorder. And this was because it just felt so natural. I mean, I love the piano and I love the flute, but it didn’t feel like it was my instrument, and all I wanted to do was play my recorder. And this was a bit of a weird choice because I didn’t have any lessons. I didn’t have a teacher. I didn’t really know what I was doing, but I just had this very strong feeling that that was what I wanted to do.

So yeah.

Christopher: That’s super interesting. We’ve talked a few times on this show before about how sometimes you need to be open to the instrument choosing you. A lot of people, when they first try learning an instrument, it doesn’t quite click and they decide they’re not musical as a result. And actually, there are so many people like yourself who become professional musicians, but not with their original first instrument. They had to try a few before something fit.

And I realize we’re going back a little bit, but can you remember why you felt that affinity for it? Was it that it came easily to you? Was it that the repertoire was appealing? Was it that something physically or like musically connected with you?

Sarah: Yeah. If I’m really honest, I would say because it came very easily and it felt very natural. When I pick up a recorder and play it, it just works and it felt so good to play. It wasn’t the repertoire because I didn’t know anything about the repertoire. In my first audition for conservatoire, I played a piece by Van Eyck, who’s a composer from the 16th century, and I chose that piece because I thought it was modern music.

It was just the feeling I got when I played the instrument.

Christopher: I see. And when you decided, “Okay, maybe a career in music is for me,” it sounds like the recorder was the obvious choice. Did you feel confident about that? Were you coming from a background and a worldview that said, “This is a reasonable thing to do. I’m well-positioned for this,” or no?

Sarah: Not at all. I mean, I want to mention something here that’s very different now. I started university, conservatoire, in 2003. Very different time. Tuition fees were very low and, for my family, completely subsidized by the government. So it was very low-risk. I’m not sure if now I was doing the same thing, with tuition fees of nine thousand a year, I think I would’ve made different choices.

So I just want to say that at the beginning. But no, aside from that, musically I felt extremely under-qualified. I didn’t really have any confidence. And I was taking A Level music, and I remember saying to my music teacher like, “Well, I’m not a real musician. All the others are real musicians but I’m not.” And I really felt that, and it took a long time to gain that confidence.

Christopher: And I know from studying up a little bit that not only were you doing A Level music, but you were also passing your grade eight, the highest instrument technique exam, on piano, flute and recorder at the same time. So how is it possible you didn’t feel like a real musician?

Sarah: I mean, as a teenager, I was also a teenager and you just have … How can I say that? Well, yeah. I was a teenager. You don’t really have much confidence then anyway. But …

Christopher: Was there anything in particular you felt was missing that the real musicians would be able to do that you couldn’t?

Sarah: I didn’t really have much concept of what a real musician was, to be honest. I didn’t know of any recorder players. No one. I vaguely heard of one person called Piers Adams, who’s now a colleague and he’s great. But that was with a music teacher telling me very disparagingly, “Well, you can’t be a recorder player because there’s only one and he’s called Piers Adams, and there’s no room for anyone else.”

I knew of things like … I thought, “Well, I’ve not really got any qualifications. I’ve not won any big competitions.” I just didn’t really have any idea of what it could be, and that made it this big, scary, unknown thing. And if I’m really honest, one of the reasons I first went and auditioned for conservatoire was because some of my friends and my boyfriend at the time were doing it. So I was like, “I’ll go too.” Yeah.

Christopher: That’s really interesting, and it’s funny. I think that kind of inferiority complex or imposter syndrome can come from the inside, where you’re like, “I don’t have what it takes.” Or it sounds like, in your case, it was coming almost more from the outside where you didn’t really know what that would look like, and so it was very hard to imagine yourself in that world of being a professional.

Sarah: Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I definitely felt that when I first got to conservatoire, because I auditioned, I got in, I was ecstatic and was like, “Oh my God, I’m doing this.” And I got there and everyone was lovely, but I was suddenly studying with people that had gone to specialized boarding schools for music, or they’d spent their whole life going to junior conservatoire, or they’d been in big competitions. They were already performing. And I was just like … I felt like I was starting right at the bottom.

But, I think that was also a good thing, because it made me work.

Christopher: Mm-hmm. And so, what did that work look like?

Sarah: Well, let me see. First I had to learn how to practice, because I hadn’t really done that in a disciplined way before. I had a lot of knowledge to learn. I had to learn about the repertoire and technique and history, the kind of context of the recorder. But I had to learn how to practice the discipline of that and actually practicing effectively. I also spent quite a lot of my first couple of years in the pub, like all English students. I was also learning how to be a person. How to live on my own when I was 18 and cook and be responsible.

But yeah. And it was balancing gaining that knowledge, which was giving me a lot of confidence, with, yeah, working out what I wanted to do with music and what kind of music I wanted to play. Yeah. That was also very important.

Christopher: Got you. Well, I wonder whether we might use that as the moment then to talk a little bit about the recorder as an instrument and the repertoire that’s out there. Because, from the sounds of it, you kind of arrived at university with a limited view to date of how the recorder existed in the world, even though you had this affinity for it and enthusiasm and a higher level of technique by this point.

If you had to distill down some of what you learned, and give people like a crash course in, “Here’s how to open your mind to the recorder as a family of instruments, and here’s what to go off and listen to to realize all the interesting things it can do,” what might that look like?

Sarah: Well, the first thing I want to say is the recorder is incredibly versatile. It exists in pretty much every time period and recorder-like instruments exist in pretty much every culture. The first flute-like instrument that works in the same way as the recorder is made of bone and it’s 40 thousand years old. So recorders everywhere.

So this means that any kind of music you want to play can fit on the instrument. Very early music, Medieval, Renaissance. Of course, you have all the Baroque. That’s where it really comes. It did exist in the Classical and Romantic period. Now there’s so much new, contemporary music. It’s also in pop music, in jazz, in folk, in free improvised music. So there really is something for everyone.

Christopher: Got you. And you mentioned contemporary music there, which I know, to a lot of people, is this big, intimidating blob of strange sounding experimental stuff. Is there any easy route into appreciating the recorder in contemporary music? Or particular artists you could point to where it’s maybe one notch more accessible if people are curious but feeling a bit overwhelmed?

Sarah: Yeah. Well, the thing with contemporary music, it’s as diverse as the entirety of classical music. It’s a really diverse genre. And when we say “contemporary music”, people often immediately think of the kind of 1960s avant-garde … In Dutch, they call it (Dutch Word) music, because it’s like peek-nor beep.

But that is just one tiny subset. Basically, contemporary music means music that is made now, so it can be anything.

Christopher: Maybe we can approach this a different way and I could ask you to talk about your own recent album, which is recorder-based music in a variety of contemporary styles. Could you give people a taste of what they might hear on that album, for example?

Sarah: Yeah. So basically, my motivation with the music on the album was very simple. I wanted to record music that I enjoy listening to. That sounds a bit obvious, but I’ll be honest, I’ve played a lot of contemporary music and many pieces are more fun to play than they are to listen to. That sounds a bit sacrilegious. But I really wanted to record pieces where I loved listening to them.

Personally, I really like minimal music, and that is … For me, the definition of minimal music is a piece created with the smallest amount of material possible. So on the album, I explore this in a lot of ways in terms of harmony, rhythm. I explore it through contemporary music, but also Medieval, Renaissance music, folk music, improvised music. So the center-piece of the album is an arrangement of Vermont Counterpoint by Steve Reich, which is a fantastic piece, originally written for flute but I think it sounds much better on recorder. And I got permission from the composer to make this arrangement, which I did with the sound artists called Müsfik Can Müftüoglu, and he made the recording of it and the electronic sounds that you hear. So that’s something I’m really proud of. It took a lot of work.

So basically, the sound of the album is quite hypnotizing. You really … Yeah, I don’t really know how to describe it. It’s a very diverse album, but what binds all of the pieces is that I think they’re very accessible to listen to, but if you really pay attention, there’s a huge amount of complexity. So you can enjoy listening to them on face value, or you can really dive in and find detail after detail after detail.

Christopher: Terrific. Well, that album is called Constellations and we’ll have a direct link to in the show notes for this episode for sure. And if people are starting to get a sense of, “Okay, the recorder is more than just the first instrument we give a classroom full of seven year olds to tootle about on,” how did your own awareness and your own identity as a musician develop during those undergrad years? Were you starting to feel like, “Oh, maybe I am a real musician”? Or how did things shape up?

Sarah: Yeah. I would say from the start I felt like, “This is what I want to be doing.” I feel really happy that I never had doubts in my choice. I think that came partly because I really made the choice myself at a late stage. I never had to worry that I was only doing it because my parents pushed me into it or something. So I think the insecurity came from comparing myself to others, and I think a turning point came for me after a couple of years.

I used to attend this really great recorder summer school called Wood House. That’s in … No, that’s in Surrey, I think. And it’s still going today. It’s a summer school for young players. And basically there I … was just really great and they really helped you to not compare yourself to others but to gain confidence in your own abilities. So basically it was just having patience, and quite a long process of gaining knowledge, gaining experience with having lessons and performing and playing for other people. There wasn’t like waving a magic wand or one simple trick. It was just a process of time.

Christopher: Got you. And you mentioned that you started off those years feeling like you were at the back of the pack in terms of your abilities, but you worked hard so it was okay. What did working hard look like? You mentioned there were some hours in the pub as well?

Sarah: Oh yeah.

Christopher: Were you practicing all hours? Was it a matter of eight hours a day until you perfected this repertoire?

Sarah: No. Well, I was also 18, 19, so I had all the energy in the world. That’s different now, unfortunately. My day would look like, I would probably get into college for about 9:00 in the morning. I had all my classes, had all the theory classes, different lessons. In between, I would fit in … hours of practice, and in the evening I would either go out dancing or work in a club. I worked behind the bar. So I didn’t really sleep much at that time. But that’s what my day looked like.

In terms of hours of practice, I was always very realistic. I had to work to support myself, so I had a part-time job. Some days I had rehearsals and lessons all day. Other days I was free and I could spend more time practicing. So I’ve never been someone that is only stuck eight hours a day in a practice room, because I don’t think that really fits within the context of a life. At the end of that, all you’ll be good at is just practicing. But I kind of used all the hours I could.

Christopher: Got you. And after that undergrad you were inspired to move abroad, in fact, to study for a master’s. Is that right?

Sarah: Yes. Yes. So, I knew, in my third year of undergrad at Birmingham Conservatoire, I knew that I wasn’t ready to finish. I wanted to do a post-grad. And everyone kept saying, “Well, if you want to study the recorder, if you’re getting into contemporary music, you’ve got to go to Amsterdam.” So I thought, “Okay. That’s where I want to go.” And I went. I didn’t have a back-up plan. Luckily it worked, so I went there.

In Amsterdam, at the Conservatorium, it’s really great for recorder. They actually make everyone do the bachelor’s again, so that’s what I did. I started in the second year of the bachelor’s, and then I did another master’s. So I ended up studying the recorder for nine years.

Christopher: Wow.

Sarah: Yeah. Yeah. It was great. I loved it. At the end, I was ready. I was like, “Okay, now it’s good. Now I can get out into the real world.” But yeah.

Christopher: And was it all smooth sailing? I seem to remember your arrival in Amsterdam was not so fortuitous when you first traveled over expecting to audition?

Sarah: Yeah. I don’t know what I was thinking. You know when you’re 21 and you think you can just do whatever you want? I basically flew to Amsterdam and walked in and was like, “Hi, can I have an audition, please?” And yeah. Luckily they said, “Yes, okay. Why are you here?” This was because … So, in England, when you audition for conservatoire, you do that around autumn time for the following academic year. In the Netherlands, the auditions are in June. So I thought, “I don’t want to audition and then have only two months. I want to audition a bit earlier so I have time.” Yeah.

Christopher: But they humored this 21 year old English girl who showed up with a great enthusiasm for the recorder?

Sarah: Exactly. I had emailed the teacher at the time and said, “Hi, I’d like to come and audition,” and they thought that I wanted to audition and start immediately so they said, “Okay. You want to come in halfway through the academic year.” And then at the end of my audition ..The good thing is, in the Netherlands, you audition and then they tell you immediately. You don’t have to go away and wait for a letter. So I auditioned, they said, “Congratulations, you’ve got in. We’d like to start you in the second year of the bachelor’s. So, will you be here next week?” And I was like, “No. I’ll be here in September.”

Yeah. It all worked out in the end.

Christopher: Absolutely. And you said that, during your undergrad, you had to learn how to practice because you hadn’t really learned that in the past and you have a really terrific video on how to practice. I wonder if you could talk a little bit about that later stage, what your life looked like, how you were studying? And I got the impression it was a step change in terms of being immersed in other recorder players and the contemporary repertoire and other interesting, innovative projects that were going on?

Sarah: So when I got to Amsterdam, I really wanted to knuckle down and take it as seriously as I could. Also, moving to a new country, it was also quite a big sacrifice. I’d left my homeland where I’d had a job and a great house and friends and a relationship. I’d left all of that to start in Amsterdam. So I really wanted to take this chance seriously. And aside from that, I was really inspired by the lessons there and the courses. I also arrived and was immediately again at the bottom of the pile, which I actually loved because I meant the only way was up and I just felt like I could really learn a lot from my classmates.

So again, I was taking all of the courses, all of the electives that I could, practicing all of the hours of the day I could. I was working in a café to support myself. So yeah. Those were crazy work days. Just long days.

One thing I want to mention is that a really important thing for me also, when I went to study … I mentioned when I met all these other people, that I felt inferior to them and like I was starting at the bottom. But I also want to say, it was amazing to meet other recorder players. To find out I wasn’t the only one. And to see from all these people I was meeting that anything was possible. All of a sudden I had role models in my teachers and my colleagues. I was getting to know more players. And I very quickly felt like the recorder is a fantastic, flexible instrument, and it has just as much possibility as any other instrument. Any other, classical, orchestral, whatever. Recorder is up there with them, too.

Christopher: Got you. And I was really keen to understand how you developed as a player over that period? Because I think, again, I’m kind of sharing all of these terrible prejudices about the recorder that apparently I have bouncing around in my head. But I think a lot of people would think of the recorder, as a serious instrument, having its place mostly in classical music where you’re given the sheet music, you play what’s on the page and that’s kind of that, and that’s your role and your duty to reproduce accurately the work of these amazing geniuses of the past.

And it’s so apparent for anyone browsing your YouTube channel that that’s not really the kind of player you are. You reminded me a lot of Dame Evelyn Glennie, who we had on the show a little while ago, who just brings this such a spark of personal enthusiasm and joy for her instrument to everything she does, and it leads to this really incredible expressive and innovative playing. I found that really came across in your videos, too, where you were talking about the technique or you were talking about the different articulations possible on the recorder, or you were demonstrating different things. It was so far from being that rigid, mechanical view of a recorder player that I guess I had inherited culturally. I wonder if you could talk a little bit about where those kinds of things like expressiveness and playing by ear, or improvising even, came into the picture for you?

Sarah: Yeah, right. So let’s think. Speaking on a professional level, interpreting the score, so playing the music accurately, playing with good technique, good tuning, hitting all of the notes and the rhythm, like playing the score correctly, that is only the very first basic level. And if you’re a professional player, of course, it’s really important that you can do that. You have to be able to do your craft well. But it’s only the first step. After that, you have this whole universe open to you of expression, of interpretation, of being creative, and that’s the part that I really find interesting.

So I spent my many hours and years in the practice room getting my technique up so I can just use the instrument and use my technique as a toolbox to say what I want to say creatively. So I just wanted to say that. I’m not saying that you should just ignore the score. Of course it’s important, if you’re using one. But there’s a lot more.

I think using all of these aspects like playing by ear, playing by heart, improvising, using strange sounds, a lot of it comes from playing different kinds of music. I grew up playing folk music and doing folk dancing as well. So folk was a big part of my life. I was playing contemporary music. Early music. I also listened to lots of different kind of music. So it’s really using different elements from different areas of music, I think, not only being stuck in one.

Christopher: Got you. And you mentioned listening there. I loved that you have a video about how to practice, and you share this kind of eight topic practice sheet that one of your teachers gave you once upon a time, to which you’ve added a ninth box for listening. Could you talk a little bit about that? Why is listening part of the practice routine, and what do you mean in that context by listening?

Sarah: It’s so important. Listening to music, and this can be listening to recordings, or live concerts, is important for so many ways. I can list them … First it can give you … Say you want to really get into a style of music like French Baroque, or Medieval, or bebop jazz. It’s so important to understand and be familiar with the language. If you know how it sounds, it’s a lot easier to achieve that yourself.

It can give you different ideas. If you’re playing a certain piece, listening to lots of different interpretations of it to give yourself different ideas. And I really like listening to music that is not classical or not recorder, just to get familiar with different things. And also pure escapism. There were many, many times where I came home after a long day of rehearsing hardcore contemporary music, and I could only listen to pop music. It’s something completely different.

And I think you should just embrace whatever music you enjoy listening to. Be unashamed in your musical choices. There is no right or wrong music to listen to. I think that’s important, too.

Christopher: Mm-hmm. And you mentioned one other thing there as part of that bundle of musicality, which was playing by heart, and listening also came up in that context, I think, in your tutorial on how to learn to play by heart, how to memorize music so that you can play it without the sheet music. You said you kind of need to start with the listening so that you have that internal representation. Is that right?

Sarah: Yeah, definitely. I mean, in order to play something by heart, you have to know how it goes. It sounds very obvious. But the first step to playing something by heart is learning how it sounds. The people who think they can’t play by heart, I would say, “Go and put on any pop song from the year you were a teenager that you listened to a lot, and I guarantee you will be able to sing along, you’ll know all the words, you’ll be humming along with the guitar solo.” That is learning by ear. And it’s just the step with doing this with an instrument is connecting your fingers and your instrument technique to this.

But learning the song in your ears is the first thing, and then translating it to the instrument comes afterwards.

Christopher: Mm-hmm. That’s a really interesting perspective on it. And why was this a topic worth mentioning and worth creating a video on for you? Because it wasn’t … I think for me, when I was growing up in music education, learning something by heart was so that you could perform it without the sheet music and impress people. I had no real appreciation that there would be a difference in my playing between the two options, and I think with your video, it came across you were very much more coming from the, “Do this because you’ll sound better,” or, “Do this because you’ll play better,” rather than, “Let’s do a neat trick where you don’t need the sheet music in front of you.”

Sarah: Yeah. I mean, if you can play a piece by heart, then you’ve really internalized it. And I definitely feel a big difference if I’m reading a piece, kind of sight-reading a piece from the sheet feels completely different to if I’ve played it by heart and … When I’m performing a piece by heart, it almost feels like I’m recomposing it every time because I’m really … You have to listen to yourself so much when you play, and you’re reacting on yourself and you’re making musical decisions, and you’re not doing anything by rote. And yeah. You just know the piece so much better.

The other thing is, it’s quite scary and it takes a huge amount of trust, and I think that trust in yourself as a performer or a musician or in your technique, that gets developed a lot when you’re learning to play by heart. So even though that performing by heart, or playing for people by heart, feels huge, when you’ve made it, it will have really benefited your playing.

Christopher: Very cool. And when you described a moment ago, you said something like, “You’ve got to get that internal representation in your head, and then the connecting it to your instrument and what notes to play is just that other bit,” and I know some people listening to that will have been like, “I can’t do that. That sounds really hard.”

Sarah: I don’t mean, “Oh, and that’s just the next thing.”

Christopher: Maybe we can talk a little bit about that. Like, how did you, or how do you, or how would you recommend someone makes that connection between, “Okay, now I can hear it vividly in my head. I can remember it. I know what I want to play. What do I do with my fingers on the recorder?”

Sarah: Yeah. I personally like to make use of all these different kinds of learning and kinds of memory. So the one I’ve spoken about is your ears already, knowing how it sounds. And also, you don’t have to completely have it memorized in your head before you start. No. It’s … these different things working together. So you’ve got your ears. You also have your muscle memory of your fingers. And muscle memory is something we use every day, like when we’re driving, or when we’re walking up the stairs or whatever. There’s your visual memory. Some people have a photographic memory where they can read the score in the head. I cannot do that. But I can kind of see the score. So I kind of know where the busy bits are and the rests and the empty bits.

Then there’s also your kind of intellectual, structural memory, just knowing it starts on a G, this is the key, this is the key signature. Or I had this pattern and it repeats four times. So I use all of those different things. And the thing is, each person will feel a stronger affinity with one of those bits than the others. You might be great at reading from memory, or you might be great at having your muscle memory, but feel less confident in the others. But because you’re combining them, they’re supporting each other.

So I think it’s about looking at those steps, working out which one is the easiest for you to start with, and using that as your point to hold onto and then bringing the others in as well.

Christopher: That makes sense. And yeah. And you provided a kind of safety net option in your tutorial on this topic which was, if you get lost, don’t panic. You can improvise your way back in. Which sounds beautiful and elegant, but again, I’m sure some people are like, “How?” So I would love if you could share your perspective on like, how can someone put those skills in place? The ability to make up the notes themselves or to figure out on the fly how to play what they’re hearing in their head?

Sarah: Yeah. The first step is practicing from memory as well. And do this quite near the beginning of learning a piece. I think that’s really important. Because if you completely perfect a piece and then try to memorize it, I find that really difficult. So I like to practice from memory. So what I do is I’ll just play a bar or half a bar, and then leave the music and practice that. In that way, you might make a wrong note, but you’ll hear it and then you’ll have to figure it out. And when you’re doing that, you’re improvising already.

The process of making a mistake, recognizing it and figuring out how to solve it is improvising. It’s nothing big or mysterious. That’s just it. And if I have these pointers along the way for myself, like, “This section is two bars. If I get lost, I know that I just …” You can also just wait those two bars and start again, or you can hold a note for two bars. Yeah.

Christopher: I love how you framed it there, that improvising doesn’t need to mean playing a killer electric guitar solo on stage or having crazy bebop jazz lines to call on. It can be that simple process of playing something, deciding whether you liked it or not, and then adapting accordingly.

Sarah: Yeah. I mean, the thing with improvising that I just want to say is that everyone does it all the time. That’s what we’re doing now in this conversation. It’s what you do when you choose your clothes in the morning, or when you decide what to have for breakfast. All it is is making a decision. That’s it. And with improvising, the scary thing is thinking like, “Okay, if I improvise, I immediately have to have this beautiful solo or beautiful piece,” and trying to figure it out beforehand. What I like to do is just start and see what happens. The worst thing that can happen is that you don’t like what you played. That’s it. So start simple and just go for it.

And when I improvise, I like to play … I call it the “open and close mentality”. So when I’m playing, everything’s open, everything is yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. Then when you finish, you can go to close and you can think back about what you played and analyze it. “I liked that, I didn’t like that.” But when you’re playing, everything is a yes.

Christopher: Mm-hmm. I love that. That’s a really healthy way of approaching it, I think, rather than having that internal critic running all the time, judging every note you play.

Sarah: Yeah.

Christopher: Got you. And speaking of making it simple and step-by-step, you had a lovely tutorial also on playing by ear, and if there’s a particular melody you’re trying to reproduce. And obviously these two go hand-in-hand to some extent. But I wonder if you could talk us through how you approach that idea of learning to play a song by ear, when you don’t have that sheet music to begin with?

Sarah: Yeah, that’s right. So the first step if I’m a learning a song by ear is, again, just listening to it again and again until you know how it sounds in your head. I would say until you can sing along, but if you don’t like to sing, that’s also no problem. Just until you know how it is, not only in terms of the melody, but the structure. Like a song, you know it’s the verse then the chorus then the verse then this. So that’s step one.

And then, aside from this, it’s really important to be able to recognize if you’re playing the same note or not. So reproducing a melody is a few steps down the line. The first step is just knowing, is this the right note? For example, recognizing yes or no. And I take this in very small steps. First, recognizing if it’s the same note, then putting two notes together, recognizing if it stays the same, or if it goes up or down. Putting three notes together, four notes.

So those are the first steps.

Christopher: I loved that you started with those building blocks, because I think people all too often jump to the whole melody and then they can’t do it and they feel like, “Okay, I can’t play by ear.” And the sequence you’ve run people through is actually quite similar to what we do on our website tonedeaftest.com where we’re trying to help people who feel like, “I don’t have the ear to be able to play by ear. Like, I’m tone deaf. I’m not going to be able to do it.” And what we show them is, “Well, first of all, can we tell are two notes the same or different? And then, if we can, can we tell if the second is higher or lower than the first one?” And 99% of people, musicians or not, can do that. And that then becomes the basis for saying, “Okay, well if we have a two note melody, then we’re almost there figuring it out. And if we have a three note melody, it’s just a step beyond that.”

And so, I loved that your approach mirrored that and it kind of makes it … I don’t want to overstate it, but it’s almost too easy to fail at. It’s so easy you can’t help but have some progress and see, “Okay, maybe this playing by ear thing is possible for me.”

Sarah: Definitely. I mean, I really liken it to learning to read. The first step is learning the letters, recognizing the letters, then remembering how they sound, linking them into words. Now, I can read by picking up a book and just … it goes very fast. I recognize whole words. But we forget that we went through months or even years of having to figure out what those words are, is it a B or a D? How does that sound? Sounding it out. I think, maybe, if we taught playing by ear at the same time as learning to read, it might be different.

Christopher: We’d have a lot more happy musicians around the world.

Sarah: Yeah. Yeah. I mean, and there are a lot of music cultures that do this, where it is a lot more intuitive and it’s really built in. Yeah. I mean, one really nice example is in Brazil, there is a really great Suzuki recorder school. It’s not really a … Suzuki isn’t something I’m really familiar with, but I’ve seen great results, and these are kids who can play so beautifully and expressively because they’ve built up these building blocks by ear, which is different than with notated music …

Christopher: Very good. So you mentioned singing in passing there. And it reminds me, on the Team Recorder YouTube channel, you have some videos which are kind of “learn to play recorder”. And so, for example, talking through the best adult method books, or what would you cover in your first lesson with a recorder? And that kind of thing. Very recorder-specific.

And then you have some like, how to practice or how to play by ear, as we’ve been talking about, where clearly a lot of the lessons are entirely transferrable to any instrument and for any musician. And then you have a few that are kind of, I don’t know, they’re semi-recorder-specific and really curious, and, for me, a couple that jumped out were how to do circular breathing, which, when I was in school, was this real black magic people talked about and no one really knew if it was even possible. And I love that now we live in the age of the internet, where you can just tune in and Sarah will show you in 10 minutes how to do it, no problem.

Sarah: Yeah.

Christopher: But the other one, and the reason I mention this, is you had one where it was like how to sing and play at the same time. And this is something we cover inside Musical U in the context of, typically a guitarist or pianist, who wants to be able to strum or play chords while they sing and perform the piece. But obviously, recorder, you’ve got a recorder in your mouth. And so, I was deeply curious to know how that works.

And I wanted to mention it here because it was a beautiful example of how your videos often have these really impactful nuggets in them, even if you’re talking about recorder-specifics and the person watching isn’t a recorder player. Because, in a moment I might ask you to talk a little bit about how you go about learning how to play and sing on the recorder, and people will see like, there’s some really fundamental, internal musicality development that’s going to come of it, whether or not you have any intention to play the recorder yourself or step up on stage and do this.

So, maybe if you wouldn’t mind, you could just explain to people how this is possible and why you might want to do it and what it sounds like?

Sarah: Yeah. Yeah, sure. Why you would want to do it is simply, I think, because it sounds good. It’s used as a technique in quite a lot of contemporary pieces that you can also accompany yourself with a drone, or you can sing a harmony part for yourself. You can play a separate harmony. For example … Or you can use your voice just as a sound color. For example, if you play and sing and same note, it just makes the sound different.

So that could be why you want to use it. With the recorder, there is no embouchure, there’s no reed, there’s nothing in the way. So you literally just sing, and make sure you’re blowing air at the same time, and the sound will come out.

Christopher: Tremendous. Yeah, and I think in your tutorial, you started off with singing the same note you were playing, and it’s that kind of sound color thing where you’re changing the timbre of the instrument in a really interesting way. And I was really surprised, I have to confess, to learn in the video that there is repertoire written with this technique in mind, it’s not like a little gimmick that you can try out for fun. Like, this is a serious part of how you would be a contemporary recorder player.

Sarah: Yeah.

Christopher: But from there, you started talking about, “Okay, well if I hold this note and then I sing a major third above it, I’m creating my own harmony.” And that idea of creating a harmony above a drone and experimenting with the sound and just creating for yourself interesting things to tune your ear into. I think for anyone who plays a melody instrument, that’s a really interesting possibility. So if you’re a saxophonist, for example, you can’t sing with the reed in your mouth, but you can record a drone of yourself playing and start experimenting with, “Can I create my own harmony above this drove, or can I create my own countermelody?”

And I really loved this as a case in point of how, what can seem like a arcane bit of technique actually opens up all kinds of musical possibilities and exploration for you.

Sarah: Yeah. Definitely. I mean, that’s one of the exercises that I think is a really nice way to get into improvising. So we’re kind of killing two birds with one stone. Is improvising over a drone. So I’m going to sing the drone. I’m going to sing that drone. And the improvisation is going to start on the same note, go somewhere else, and come back. And that, I think, is a really accessible exercise to do. So I’m going to try that.

Because you’re playing over a drone, basically everything sounds nice. And what’s important there is listening to which notes fit and which don’t. The consonance and dissonance. And yeah. That’s a really nice starting point for improvisation.

Christopher: Fantastic. Well, it’s probably more than clear at this point, but I do wholeheartedly recommend checking out the Team Recorder YouTube channel, whether you’re a recorder player or not. And of course, Sarah’s album, Constellations, which we’ll have a link to in the show notes.

Sarah, it’s been such a pleasure getting to talk to you. I knew from watching all of your videos that it would be a fascinating conversation and it certainly has been. So just a big thank you for taking the time to share with us on the show today.

Sarah: You’re very welcome. Thank you for having me.

Enjoying the show? Please consider rating and reviewing it!

The post Playing With Heart and By Heart, with Sarah Jeffery appeared first on Musical U.

3 Lessons on Music Practice From The World’s Top Bassists

New musicality video:

Have you found yourself losing enthusiasm for music practice? It might sound surprising, but whatever instrument you play, it’s possible that the musical role played by bassists actually gives them a unique insight into how to keep practice interesting and effective… http://musicalitypodcast.com/178

In this episode I’m going to share three big lessons from three of the world’s top bass educators. Stay tuned!

Listen to the episode: http://musicalitypodcast.com/178

Links and Resources

Scott’s Bass Lessons : https://scottsbasslessons.com/

The Roots of Greatness, with Scott Devine : https://www.musical-u.com/learn/the-roots-of-greatness-with-scott-devine/

Adam Neely on YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCnkp4xDOwqqJD7sSM3xdUiQ

The Power of Curiosity, with Adam Neely : https://www.musical-u.com/learn/the-power-of-curiosity-with-adam-neely/

Steve Lawson’s Website : http://www.stevelawson.net/

About Interleaved Practice : https://www.musical-u.com/learn/why-youre-not-making-progress-instrument-fix-it/

Forget Being Realistic – Do This Instead : https://www.musical-u.com/learn/forget-being-realistic-do-this-instead/

Hey! Where are you going? : https://www.musical-u.com/learn/hey-where-are-you-going/

How to Improve AND Enjoy Your Musical Life : https://www.musical-u.com/learn/how-to-improve-and-enjoy-your-musical-life/

About Deliberate Practice in Music : https://www.musical-u.com/learn/deliberate-practice-music/

Creativity Is The Vehicle, Not the Destination : https://www.musical-u.com/learn/creativity-is-the-vehicle-not-the-destination/

If you enjoy the show please rate and review it! http://musicalitypodcast.com/review

Join Musical U with the Special offer for podcast listeners http://musicalitypodcast.com/join

Let us know what you think! Email: hello@musicalitypodcast.com

===============================================

Learn more about Musical U!

Website:
https://www.musical-u.com/

Podcast:
http://musicalitypodcast.com 

Tone Deaf Test:
http://tonedeaftest.com/

Musicality Checklist:
https://www.musical-u.com/mcl-musicality-checklist 

Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/MusicalU 

YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/c/MusicalU

Subscribe for more videos from Musical U!

3 Lessons on Music Practice From The World’s Top Bassists

3 Lessons on Better Practice From The World’s Top Bassists

Have you found yourself losing enthusiasm for music practice? It might sound surprising, but whatever instrument you play, it’s possible that the musical role played by *bassists* actually gives them a unique insight into how to keep practice interesting and effective…

In this episode I’m going to share three big lessons from three of the world’s top bass educators. Stay tuned!

Listen to the episode:

Enjoying the show? Please consider rating and reviewing it!

Links and Resources

Enjoying The Musicality Podcast? Please support the show by rating and reviewing it!

Rate and Review!

Transcript

Hi, my name’s Christopher, I’m the founder and Director of Musical U, and this is Musicality Now.

Recently I sat down with Scott Devine, founder of Scott’s Bass Lessons, the biggest bass education website by far, to interview him for the show. And if you missed that episode, go back and listen now because there were a ton of valuable lessons in there.

But there was one lesson that really stuck out to me, on the subject of music practice. And as I thought about it after the interview I was reminded of two other impactful lessons about music practice that have come up for me in the last few years. And I realised that both of those came from bass players too!

Just a coincidence? Maybe. But as you’ll hear when I share these lessons, it’s also possible that the strict and formulaic role the bassist often plays actually leads bassists to be more exploratory and innovative in the way they practice.

To put it bluntly: if the thing they’re practicing isn’t interesting, they end up finding ways to make it interesting. And this isn’t exclusive to bassists – maybe they’re just an extreme case of what we all experience as musicians.

So here’s the first lesson, from Scott Devine. We were talking about what sets the great bassists of the world apart from the hobbyists and even the “good” professional-level players.

And he said it seems to boil down to the way they practice.

Specifically, that they have an intense focus and determination. But what’s fascinating – and encouraging for all of us as musicians – is that he said this isn’t about some brutal, gruelling process they force themselves through.

That focus and determination actually comes from a child-like curiosity and enthusiasm.

Have you ever had that experience where you discover something new in your musical life that just grabs you. Maybe a new artist, a particular song, a new style of music or technique on your instrument. And you’re so intrigued and excited about it, you go deep. You cast aside all the things you’re “meant” to be practicing, you somehow carve out lots of extra little bits of music practice time here and there because you just can’t help yourself.

That’s what we’re talking about here. It’s like instead of having to push yourself forwards step by step you’re insted being *pulled* forwards effortlessly by the thing you’re excited about.

That can happen with something small – like I said, a particular piece of music or new technique – or it can happen with some fresh big-picture motivation like joining a new group, committing to a concert date, or defining a really inspiring “big picture vision”. Check the shownotes for a link to a couple of past episodes on goal setting for more on that.

So this is a big lesson: that the secret to becoming truly great – or even just to improving consistently over time – isn’t about forcing yourself through a painful grind – it’s about tapping into that childlike enthusiasm that means the work no longer feels like work at all.

That leads on to lesson number two which came from Adam Neely, music theory YouTuber supreme and faculty member at the Scott’s Bass Lessons Academy.

In our interview one of the stand-out points was that when talking about how he practiced to get so good on bass Adam said he never held back from following his intellectual curiosity. Although he was spending hours practicing, even simple scale drills got transformed into continually-varied exercises. He felt no obligation to practice the same thing in exactly the same way again and again.

Repetition is important for learning, but that doesn’t mean that the overall practice has to be mind-numbingly same-y throughout. Normally you find that there’s some independent part of what you’re practicing that you can freely vary.

For example if you’re trying to nail the fingering for a scale then you do need to practice that fingering again and again – but the *way* you play the notes, such as the articulation or dynamics or rhythm – those can all be varied in infinite ways.

This is an incredibly important idea for a couple of reasons.

The first is that it helps keep your brain engaged. Particularly if you’re an intellectual type of person whose brain is always churning away, it can be hard to force yourself to do mindless repetition – and you end up in that world of relying on pure self-discipline and the painful grind. By allowing yourself to find ways to explore and experiment as part of the exercises and drills you’re able to keep your brain focused throughout, and that naturally leads to much more efficient learning.

The second reason this is a big idea is what ties in with Scott’s lesson about childlike curiosity: when you spice up your practice like this it’s just going to be more *fun*! And if you’re coming from the ultra-rational mindset that can seem like a wasteful indulgence – but in fact it both aids effective learning and helps you keep up your motivation over time. The importance of enjoying music practice should not be underestimated! In fact we dedicated a whole past episode to how you can improve *and* enjoy your music practice, I’ll put a link to that in the shownotes.

So that was the big lesson from Adam Neely: that mixing things up in your music practice can lead to more enjoyment and more improvement, not less.

The third lesson was from our own Resident Pro for bass here at Musical U, Steve Lawson. Steve is a prolific and celebrated solo bassist whose work is almost exclusively improvised.

I’ve had the benefit of taking a number of 1-on-1 private bass lessons with Steve and it’s no exaggeration to say he flipped my idea of music practice completely on its head.

I came from a world of scales and exercises and learning sheet music note-by-note growing up – and although I’ve moved away from that into a more free and creative identity as a musician over the years, in large part through my own musicality training, I definitely still had that model in mind that music practice means sitting down for half an hour and running through a checklist of the things you were meant to do. And without those lessons from Scott and Adam we’ve just talked about, there’s a huge risk there that your enthusiasm is rapidly drained and your progress stalls.

Now there’s lots we could discuss about how to improve that traditional music practice session, like leveraging deliberate practice, interleaved practice, mixing things up like we just discussed, having a clear vision to inspire you, suitable support and guidance, and a ton more.

But what I wanted to share here was the mindset shift Steve clued me in to, which is compatible with all that – but utterly transforms the experience.

I would show up to my lessons with some particular technique or idea I was struggling with, and subconsciously expecting Steve to hand me a set of exercises and maybe a piece or two that I could go away and drill away on to master the thing.

Instead, every time I would show up, Steve would listen to what I was coming in with. And then we’d have fun playing music together for an hour!

Somehow he immediately transformed whatever nugget I came in with into not a set of exercises, but an improvised composition of some kind that we could explore together. And he’d send me away not with homework of doing twelve exercises ten times each – but with these interesting ideas for how to begin improvising in a particular direction or context – and normally a list of recommended listening to go away and enjoy too!

And here’s the thing: this wasn’t a distraction from what I’d come in wanting to learn. What we played together was always centered around the technique or the concept that I’d wanted to improve on. And what Steve showed me was that wanting to improve at something doesn’t need to mean sitting down and throwing yourself directly at that thing again and again in a dry, scientific way. In fact, it can mean sitting down and making some music, and featuring that thing in your creative music-making.

Now this *idea* wasn’t new to me. In fact you’ll find past episodes of this show talking about including creativity at the core of your music practice and it’s a big part of our teaching at Musical U. But my respect for Steve and our lessons together gave me a chance to really internalise and use this in a much deeper way than I had before.

I’ll confess: this is all stuff I’m still working on myself. I think I had too many years of the old approach, so over time I still trend back towards that brute-force disciplined approach and feeling guilty if I enjoy my music practice!

But I try to keep these three lessons front and center and return to them often:

  • From Scott: that the secret to greatness is tapping into that genuine child-like enthusiasm.
  • From Adam: that there’s always a way to make repetition feel less repetitive and keep it interesting.
  • And from Steve: that music practice can and should mean music-*making*.

Put together, these give a clear message that the most effective music practice is exciting, it’s interesting and it’s creative.

So the next time you find yourself feeling less than enthusiastic about sitting down to practice, ask yourself which of these might be missing.

Are you tapping into what genuinely excites you in music?

Are you finding ways to vary your practice to keep your brain 100% engaged?

And are you making sure that the notes you play during music practice are actually making music?

Take on board these three lessons from some of the world’s top bass instructors – and I think you’ll find you have a lot more success and delight in your music practice.

And the next time you see a bass player at the back of the band playing root notes – maybe give them a bit more credit. They just might know a thing or two about music practice that we could all do with learning…

Enjoying the show? Please consider rating and reviewing it!

The post 3 Lessons on Better Practice From The World’s Top Bassists appeared first on Musical U.